Fill in Order Details

  • Submit paper details for free using our simple order form

Make Payment Securely

  • Add funds to your account. There are no upfront payments. The writer will only be paid once you have approved your paper

Writing Process

  • The best qualified expert writer is assigned to work on your order
  • Your paper is written to standard and delivered as per your instructions

Download your paper

  • Download the completed paper from your online account or your email
  • You can request a plagiarism and quality report along with your paper

For this assignment, you will assess methods of training and development such as presentation, hands-on, group building, or technology-based training program for the managers of Beefsteak. You will need to determine how Beefsteak, with its quick growth, will train managers as the company continues to expand.

For this assignment, you will assess methods of training and development such as presentation, hands-on, group building, or technology-based training program for the managers of Beefsteak. You will need to determine how Beefsteak, with its quick growth, will train managers as the company continues to expand.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

  • Read Chapter 16 in Applied Psychology in Talent Management.

This week’s topic has been the considerations and design of training and development programs. Draw upon your reflections of the readings and discussion this week as you apply the Beefsteak Case Study to this assignment.

For this assignment, you will assess methods of training and development such as presentation, hands-on, group building, or technology-based training program for the managers of Beefsteak. You will need to determine how Beefsteak, with its quick growth, will train managers as the company continues to expand. Include the essential elements for measuring training outcomes from Chapter 16 of the course textbook. Identify the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation. Distinguish between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects and provide your rationale supported by the course materials and additional research.

In your paper,

  • Evaluate various methods of training and development outcomes.
  • Assess the methods of training and development.
  • Discuss the essential elements for measuring training outcomes.
  • Identify the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation.
  • Assess the outcomes of training, distinguishing between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects.

The Implementation and Measurement of Outcomes With Beefsteak Case Study paper,

critical appraisal

Description:

Total Possible Score: 9.00

Evaluates Various Methods of Training and Development Outcomes, and Assesses the Method of Training and Development

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly evaluates various methods of training and development outcomes, and comprehensively assesses the method of training and development.

Proficient – Evaluates various methods of training and development outcomes, and assesses the method of training and development. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially evaluates various methods of training and development outcomes, and minimally assesses the method of training and development. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to evaluate various methods of training and development outcomes and assess the method of training and development; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The evaluation of various methods of training and development outcomes and assessment of the method of training and development are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Discusses the Essential Element for Measuring Training Outcomes, and Identifies the Key Principles of Instructional Design to Encourage Learner Participation

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively discusses the essentials element for measuring training outcomes, and clearly and accurately identifies the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation.

Proficient – Discusses the essential elements for measuring training outcomes, and identifies the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation. Minor details are missing, slightly unclear, or inaccurate.

Basic – Partially discusses the essential elements for measuring training outcomes, and vaguely identifies the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation. Relevant details missing, unclear, and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to discuss the essential elements for measuring training outcomes and identify the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation; however, significant details are missing, unclear, and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – The discussion of the essential elements for measuring training outcomes and identification of the key principles of instructional design to encourage learner participation are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Assesses the Outcomes of Training, Distinguishing Between the Outcomes of Statistically Significant Effects from Practically Efficient Effects

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly assesses the outcomes of training, clearly distinguishing between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects.

Proficient – Assesses the outcomes of training, distinguishing between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic – Partially assesses the outcomes of training, vaguely distinguishing between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations – Attempts to assess the outcomes of training; however, does not distinguish between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects, and/or significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance – The assessment of the outcomes of training, distinguishing between the outcomes of statistically significant effects from practically efficient effects is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Reviews


Anonymous

Excellent job, received an A+ (96) on the paper. Thank you so much.

Anonymous

On time and beyond the work I expected. Communication is fast and amazing, this is the only writing service I will be using.

Consider Your Assignments Done

“All my friends and I are getting help from eliteacademicresearch. It’s every college student’s best kept secret!”

Jermaine Byrant
BSN

“I was apprehensive at first. But I must say it was a great experience and well worth the price. I got an A!”

Nicole Johnson
Finance & Economics

See Why Our Clients Hire Us Again And Again!

OVER
10.3k
Reviews

RATING
4.89/5
Avg Rating

YEARS
12
Experience

Elite Academic Research Promises You:

Always on Time

If we are a minute late, the work is on us – it’s free!

Plagiarism-free

If the work we produce contains plagiarism we’ll pay out a £5,000 guarantee.

Quality

Providing quality work is core to our beliefs, which is why we will strive to give you exactly that, and more!

Written to Standard

All of our assignments go through a stringent quality checking process from start to finish.

Success Guarantee

When you order form the best, some of your greatest problems as a student are solved!

Reliable

Professional

Affordable

Quick

What our customers say
_____

Zahraa S
Zahraa S
Absolutely spot on. I have had the best experience with Elite Academic Research and all my work have scored highly. Thank you for your professionalism and using expert writers with vast and outstanding knowledge in their fields. I highly recommend any day and time.
Stuart L
Stuart L
Thanks for keeping me sane for getting everything out of the way, I’ve been stuck working more than full time and balancing the rest but I’m glad you’ve been ensuring my school work is taken care of. I'll recommend Elite Academic Research to anyone who seeks quality academic help, thank you so much!
Mindi D
Mindi D
Brilliant writers and awesome support team. You can tell by the depth of research and the quality of work delivered that the writers care deeply about delivering that perfect grade.
Samuel Y
Samuel Y
I really appreciate the work all your amazing writers do to ensure that my papers are always delivered on time and always of the highest quality. I was at a crossroads last semester and I almost dropped out of school because of the many issues that were bombarding but I am glad a friend referred me to you guys. You came up big for me and continue to do so. I just wish I knew about your services earlier.
Cindy L
Cindy L
You can't fault the paper quality and speed of delivery. I have been using these guys for the past 3 years and I not even once have they ever failed me. They deliver properly researched papers way ahead of time. Each time I think I have had the best their professional writers surprise me with even better quality work. Elite Academic Research is a true Gem among essay writing companies.
Got an A and plagiarism percent was less than 10%! Thanks!
My writer was awesome! They got my paper to me earlier than my deadline & I received all 100 points on my grade! Thank you so much!
Excellent work. Well written, few grammatical errors but other than that you did a phenomenal job.