*Please do not bid if you do not know the knowledge of the art leadership. Seriously. It takes time and it is a lot work...
Basically, you need to revise the paper based on professor’s comments and feedback, reorganize the sources in APA format, check the grammar. The two basic reading are Leadership Theory by Dugan, and Intersectionality as Critical Theory by Hill Collins and other sources. These are comments from professor:
–make clear transitions from paragraph to paragraph to allow the reader to follow the discussion of voices
–make sure you clarify terms like intersectionality and decolonization (etc.) and how they are applied within your particular review context
–stay focused on your question
–make sure each paragraph has one main point
–avoid plagiarism – make sure all direct quotations use QUOTES
–avoid just putting lots of citations together unless you are certain all of those sources say the same thing
–clarify what you mean by “success” as this is not clarified within the review at all
Below is the requirement and rubric for the assignment.
As you prepare your literature review, consider the following questions:
- What literature (including course readings from ARTL 5250 and ARTL 5150) as well as your lived experience of leadership practices inform your approach to the question? How does the literature connect with your question? For example, are there specific authors, theories, concepts, practices, or methods that inform your question?
- How do your sources dialogue with each other and your question? Attend to connections that arose during any of our Weekly Discussions and/or in-class activities/discussions.
- How are you situating your question within the extensive literature on leadership? Are you extending it, building upon it, critiquing it, and/or otherwise engaging with those sources?
- How are you drafting your literature review? Again, use this “Writing a Literature Review Assignment” resource from RMIT.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBalance of Diverse SourcesSources speak to the main question, contribute to the overall understanding of the context, and represent a diverse set of voices and bodies in response to the question. Diversity is considered through an intersectional and decolonial lens as well as a varied approach to artistic disciplines. |
|
25.0 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePositionally Qualified and Biases NamedThis is not an opinion piece. The author acknowledges their perspective, privileges, and/or preferences in response to the question and the literature as a part of the way in which the question is both represented and addressed. The pursuit is of intersectionality and decolonized methodology embodied within the work. |
|
25.0 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClear, Focused Main QuestionThe question is directly connected to the discussion of sources and demonstrates a solid understanding of how leadership theory is situated within the given context of power. If sub-questions are used, they fit the size and scope of the literature review and help bring additional relevance to what is being asked to further the application of intersectionality and decolonization as leadership practice. |
|
15.0 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormative ContentThe sources include the main ideas, theories, and concepts related to the main question. Areas of agreement and disagreement are noted. Any problems or gaps in the literature related to the question are named. Review avoids descriptive or report style writing and focuses on synthesis, analysis, and evaluation in order to highlight biases, assumptions, as well as areas for growth and change. |
|
25.0 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA ContentFor purposes of this review, APA format is explicitly followed for both style and references. The final paper includes use of a title page, abstract, and references, and is between 8-10 pages with at least 10-12 sources included. |
|
10.0 pts |
|||||
|
Total Points: 100.0 |
|||||||
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
