Need help with my writing homework on Role of Ethics in Appointing a Suitable Candidate for the Post of a Receptionist in a Dental Practice. Write a 2000 word paper answering; Many theories and arguments have evolved over the years regarding the use of ethical considerations in all spheres of life. A dental practice is planning to hire a receptionist and a total of five qualified and competent candidates have been shortlisted. Each of these candidates has some attributes that stand out, which could become crucial in the person’s appointment for the post.

The problem with a discussion on ethics is that it could cover a diverse area that includes personal beliefs, religious beliefs, social practices, and legal statutes and provisions. In most instances, ethics is about making choices. According to Devettere, ethics is choosing the good over the bad in a particular situation. So, “ethics is not concerned with what people do accidentally or unintentionally, even if these behaviors cause bad things” (Devettere 2000, 1). The consequences of an accidental or unintentional act can is not relevant in such instances. There are also others who identify ethics with morality. What is moral is ethical and anything immoral is unethical. So, a conscious and intentional decision as in this case of appointment of receptionist has ethical dimensions. A decision, whether it is ethical or not, may turn out to be easy in most circumstances. But in this instance (for appointing the receptionist), the attributes do not have a clear identity as to what is good and bad. For example, being obese or having certain religious preferences cannot be considered good or bad unless it is harmful to the self or others in society.

The concept of absolutism may be no longer relevant in a democratic setup. It deals with the divine right of kings as opposed to general ethical behavior. The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy and the rule of law and democracy prevails even though the country is headed by a Queen. Absolutism is also related to autocratic behavior in the sense that an employer can behave in any way he likes to his employee.