Write a 1,200-1,500 word analysis of ‘Case Study: Healing andAutonomy.’ In light of the readings, be sure to address the followingquestions:Under the Christian narrative and Christian vision, what sorts of issues are most pressing in this case study?Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James?According to the Christian narrative and the discussion of theissues of treatment refusal, patient autonomy, and organ donation in thetopic readings, how might one analyze this case?According to the topic readings and lecture, how ought the Christianthink about sickness and health? What should Mike as a Christian do?How should he reason about trusting God and treating James?Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APAStyle Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is notrequired.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior tobeginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations forsuccessful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.PHI-413V-RS-T3CaseStudy.docxCase Study: Healing and AutonomyCase Study: Healing and AutonomyMike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel,identical twins born eight years ago. James is currently suffering from acuteglomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought into thehospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spreadof the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’condition was acute enough to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases ofacute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on theirown, or with an antibiotic. However, James also had elevated blood pressure andenough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve. The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis. Aftersome time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they aregoing to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne hadbeen moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also hadwitnessed a close friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healingservice after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take Jamesimmediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James throughmultiple rounds of dialysis. Yet Mike and Joanne agreed to return to thehospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes thatJames would be healed by then. Two days later the family returned, and was forced to placeJames on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed andtormented by his decision to not treat James earlier. Had he not enough faith?Was God punishing him or James? To make matters worse, James kidneys haddeteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter, and was inneed of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediatelyoffered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were notcompatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis,some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidneyto James. However, none of them were tissue matches. James’ nephrologist called to schedule a private appointmentwith Mike and Joanne. James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but wouldrequire a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, thenephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissuematch, but as of yet had not been considered—James’ brother Samuel. Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he shouldhave his other son Samuel lose a kidney, or perhaps wait for God to do amiracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faithwill come in? “This time around, it is a matter of life and death, what couldrequire greater faith than that?” Mike reasons.