Use of Architecture and Design to Protect against Natural Disasters

Although natural catastrophes have occurred throughout history, recent years have seen an increase in the frequency and severity of these events. Design and architecture have evolved with technological advancements and a need to add value to the element of protection in the wake of an increase in natural disasters (Building Stronger Case Study). Design and architectural components must be applied in ensuring that disaster-sensitive materials are used, that curvy designs are applied to reduce risks of extreme weather, and that reinforced building structures and plans are enforced as part of the minimum code standards.

Disaster-sensitive materials should be matched to the risk profile of a region to ensure that a building matches design and architectural requirements vis-à-vis the natural disasters. Different natural disasters such as earthquakes or hurricanes, and tornadoes require different building materials. It is important to note that materials applicable to a hurricane-prone area may not necessarily be fit for an earthquake-prone region. For example, wooden frames may work as light-weight materials for an earthquake-prone area but work against bush fire-prone regions. Disaster-sensitive materials must be appraised per region.

Curvy designs and aerodynamic exteriors are architectural and design solutions that will revolutionize how buildings can protect against hurricanes and their damages. Design must correct traditional flaws in construction to ensure more modern solutions. For example, wind-related disasters can be avoided by incorporating better edges, corners, and roofing designs.

In an ideal world, newly constructed structures would be designed with the intention of withstanding the effects of natural disasters by way of reinforced building structures. Each and every building should be built from the ground up using a blueprint that included provisions for making it resistant to the effects of natural disasters as mentioned in the Building Stronger case study. Architectural professionals and their clients worry about cost implications more than the design soundness of a structure (Building Stronger Case Study).

In summary, design and architectural components must be employed in the entire process of construction. Minimum code requirements should ensure that disaster-sensitive materials are used, curving designs are applied to lessen severe weather hazards, and reinforced building structures and plans are enforced. Such measures will ensure that technology and design elements are used positively to protect human life and property in the face of natural disasters.