U1L01D1 – Unit 1 Discussions Write a situation that involves someone engaging in anTeen boy spraying grafitti on walls in street illegal activity that many people feel is ethical and should not be illegal. Then respond to one other person’s post, but you must provide an argument as to why the unethical and illegal activity should remain illegal. U1L02W1 – Create a post with four of the sources of law -Marriage Constiution Law, Statutory Law, Case Law, Administrative Law. Directions: Each student must research one example of a law that was created by one of the sources. Students must provide the following information under the source of law it goes with: Student’s name, recite the actual law, website used, why it falls into this source of law. U1L03W1 – You must find a case that was heard in the federalFederal tax fraud with handcufffs court system related to one of the following types of violations: Constitutional Rights, Federal Crime, Maritime Case, Patent or Copyright Case. You must have a different case than a classmate’s post, so be sure to read the other cases posted. Provide the following information: Your name, Identify violation that causes it to be a federal case, specific information about the case, website where you found it and why you think it is this type of violation. U1L04D1 – Post a comment regarding whether you think it is fair Attorney talking to jury to have both a criminal and a civil trial brought against a person. Use supporting facts or a case you find online to help support your response. Then respond to one person’s post that you agree with and tell why you agree with them. Then respond to another person’s post that you disagree with, and tell why you disagree with them. U1L05W1 – Research a case where State of Mind was used toEmotional looking woman determine the innocence of a suspect. In your post, provide the details of the case in a summary and the website where you found the case information. Respond to one classmate’s post and indicate why you think the state of mind presented in the case was the factor that changed the case. U1L06D1 Locate four cases. One for each of the fourMan being interrogated defenses from this lesson: Insanity, Self-defense, Entrapment, and Statute of Limitation. Record the following information about each case: Summary of what happened in the case, the defense that was used, the outcome of the case and the website used to gather the information. In your post provide a summary of the case but do not share the defense that was used or the outcome of the case. U1L07D1 – Unit 1 Discussions There are times when a juvenile can be treated andYoung man in hand cuffs charged as an adult for a crime they committed. Create a post that identifies when you think it is fair to charge a juvenile as an adult. Find a case that supports your opinion and share a summary of this case and the website. U1L08D1 – Unit 1 Discussions Share your opinion on the difference between Crime scene investigation the levels of murder or the difference between levels of manslaughter. Be sure to include an example to support your opinion. U1L09D1 Complete the internet activity from this lesson, thenTeen age girl getting bullied over text return to collaborate with your peers. Part 1: Share why you think it is a tort and the topics in the article that were discussed in the unit that connect it to a tort. Part 2: Now respond to the following: What type of remedies should be given to the victim of cyberbullying and why? U1L010D1 Complete the internet activity from this lesson, thenCup of coffee in carrier return to collaborate with your peers. Part 1: Based on the Burger King case you read, post one comment that supports your position. Half of you will represent the defendant Burger King, and half of you will represent the plaintiff Kathleen. So if you are on the defendant’s team, each of you post a reason why Burger King should not be held liable. If you are on the plaintiff’s team, each of you post a reason why the plaintiff is entitled to remedies for the burns she suffered. If all the reasons are taken, provide a case that supports your side’s argument.