Below is the guideline for the major project

Titled “To analyse the uptake and impact of Early Infant Diagnosis (EID) of HIV in Nigeria along the PMTCT cascade compared with other nations
“

Guidelines for writing a Systematic Review 7000 words max.

The following outlines a structure to follow when reporting a Systematic Review. The main heading are suggested but can be amended if required. However the final report must include the content outlined in the guidelines below. In addition the reported processes
must be justified not simply statedas having been undertaken. Marks, which reflects the overall weighting given to each section are indicated. Allocation of marks will be linked to ARU generic marking standards for level 7

Title 0%

id=”slidingDiv”>
id=”pnlExtracted” class=”attachprev”>
Document Preview
class=”clear”>

Hello, Below is the guideline for the major project Titled “To analyse the uptake and impact of Early Infant Diagnosis (EID) of HIV in Nigeria along the PMTCT cascade compared with other nations”     Guidelines for writing a Systematic Review 7000 words max.  The following outlines a structure to follow when reporting a Systematic Review. The main heading are suggested but can be amended if required. However the final report must include the content outlined in the guidelines below. In addition the reported processes must be justified not simply stated as having been undertaken. Marks, which reflects the overall weighting given to each section are indicated. Allocation of marks will be linked to ARU generic marking standards for level 7 Title 0% Title The title of the article should convey something specific about the topic   Abstract and Keywords 5% (relates to LO 3) Abstract Key words     ?         Max 200 words are required. ?         The abstract must be divided into the following sections background; objectives; data sources; review methodology; results; conclusion. · include 3 to 5 keywords.   Background and Aims and objectives 15% (relates to LO1) Introduction · Rationale, context for the study. Background · Should be a synthesis of literature identifying what is known about the topic. · Indicate clearly what your review may add to what is already known. · If existing review on the topic are available, state reasons for the update. Review Aims · Explicit statement of the review questions or hypothesis. · objectives     Methodology and protocol 25% (relates to LO2 and 3) Design   ·        quantitative, ·        qualitative ·        mixed methods Search Strategy ·        Database searches ·        Search terms ·        Any restrictions on the search ·        Journal hand searched ·        Organisations and topic experts contacted ·        Internet search strategy ·        Bibliography and reference list search ·        Outcome of the…

id=”divAttachment” class=”answer”>

Attachments

id=”divAssignmentAttachment”>
class=”AttachmentBox”>
Document1.docx

class=”clear”>