The Hiring Process and Managing a Diverse Workforce

answer all of the questions completely and use the grading rubrics to confirm each part of the question is answered

Assignment 2: The Hiring Process and Managing a Diverse Workforce.

Imagine that you are the HR Director at your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar. As the HR Director, you must use different employment law requirements to create methods and policies that support the promotion of a diverse workforce. Select one (1) job opportunity that you have held or with which you are familiar within the same organization for this scenario.
(Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of these assignments. In your original work, you may use aspects of existing processes from either your current or a former place of employment. However, you must remove any and all identifying information that would enable someone to discern the organization[s] that you have used.)
Write a nine to twelve (9-12) page paper in which you:
1.    Develop three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and suggest two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Justify your response.
2.    Outline an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.
3.    Develop a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.
4.    Decide on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and justify the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.
5.    Choose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Justify the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.
6.    Formulate a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Specify the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Next, suggest one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Justify your suggestion.
7.    Recommend two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Argue two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.
8.    Select one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Recommend an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Justify your recommendation.
9.    Choose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Then, outline a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Justify your response.
10.    Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
•    Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
•    Determine employment laws that apply to the selection, development, and management of employees.
•    Evaluate policies and processes that promote a diverse workforce.
•    Use technology and information resources to research issues in employment law.
•    Write clearly and concisely about employment law using proper writing mechanic.
Points: 400    Assignment 2: The Hiring Process and Managing a Diverse Workforce
Criteria    Unacceptable
Below 70% F    Fair
70-79% C    Proficient
80-89% B    Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Develop three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and suggest two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Justify your response.
Weight: 10%    Did not submit or incompletely developed three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.    Partially developed three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and partially suggested two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Partially justified your response.    Satisfactorily developed three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and satisfactorily suggested two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Satisfactorily justified your response.    Thoroughly developed three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and thoroughly suggested two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Thoroughly justified your response.
2. Outline an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.
Weight: 10%    Did not submit or incompletely outlined an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.    Partially outlined an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.    Satisfactorily outlined an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.    Thoroughly outlined an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.
3. Develop a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.
Weight: 10%    Did not submit or incompletely developed a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.    Partially developed a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.    Satisfactorily developed a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.    Thoroughly developed a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.
4. Decide on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and justify the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.
Weight: 5%    Did not submit or incompletely decided on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and did not submit or incompletely justified the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.    Partially decided on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and partially justified the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.    Satisfactorily decided on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and satisfactorily justified the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.    Thoroughly decided on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and thoroughly justified the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.
5. Choose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Justify the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.
Weight: 5%    Did not submit or incompletely chose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Did not submit or incompletely justified the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.    Partially chose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Partially justified the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.    Satisfactorily chose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Satisfactorily justified the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.    Thoroughly chose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Thoroughly justified the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.
6. Formulate a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Specify the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Next, suggest one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Justify your suggestion.
Weight: 10%    Did not submit or incompletely formulated a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Did not submit or incompletely specified the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Did not submit or incompletely justified your suggestion.    Partially formulated a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Partially specified the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Partially suggested one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Partially justified your suggestion.    Satisfactorily formulated a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Satisfactorily specified the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Satisfactorily suggested one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Satisfactorily justified your suggestion.    Thoroughly formulated a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Thoroughly specified the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Thoroughly suggested one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Thoroughly justified your suggestion.
7. Recommend two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Argue two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.
Weight: 5%    Did not submit or incompletely recommended two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Did not submit or incompletely argued two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.    Partially recommended two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Partially argued two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.    Satisfactorily recommended two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Satisfactorily argued two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.    Thoroughly recommended two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Thoroughly argued two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.
8. Select one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Recommend an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Justify your recommendation.
Weight: 10%    Did not submit or incompletely selected one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Did not submit or incompletely recommended an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Did not submit or incompletely justified your recommendation.    Partially selected one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Partially recommended an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Partially justified your recommendation.    Satisfactorily selected one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Satisfactorily recommended an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Satisfactorily justified your recommendation.    Thoroughly selected one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Thoroughly recommended an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Thoroughly justified your recommendation.
9. Choose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Then, outline a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Justify your response.
Weight: 10%    Did not submit or incompletely chose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Did not submit or incompletely outlined a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.    Partially chose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Partially outlined a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Partially justified your response.    Satisfactorily chose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Satisfactorily outlined a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Satisfactorily justified your response.    Thoroughly chose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Thoroughly outlined a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Thoroughly justified your response.
10. 4 references
Weight: 5%     No references provided.    Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.    Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.    Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
11. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%    Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.    Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.    Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.    Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
12. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and  reference
Weight: 5%    Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.    In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.    Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.    In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
13. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%    Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.    Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
     Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.    Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
14. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%    Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.    Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.    Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
     Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Proceedings, LXXVIII (May 1988), 429-34.
Bernstein, J., and M. Nadiri, “Research and Development and Intra-industry
Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality,” Review of Economic
Studies, LVI (April 1989), 249-67.
Dorfman, N., “Route 128: The Development of a Regional High-Technology
598 QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Economy,” D. Lampe, ed., The Massachusetts Miracle: High Technology and
Economic Revitalization (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).
Feller, Irwin, “R&D Theories and State Advanced Technology Programs,” Paper
prepared for the American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual
Meeting, January 1989.
Glaeser, Edward, H. D. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer, “Growth in
Cities,” NBER Working Paper No. 3787, July 1991.
Griliches, Z., “The Search for R&D Spillovers,” NBER Working Paper No. 3768,
July 1991.
Grossman, G., and E. Helpman, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy
(Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1991).
Jaffe, Adam, “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from
Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value,” American Economic Review,
LXXVI (1986), 984-1001.
, “Real Effects of Academic Research,” American Economic Review, LXXIX
(1989), 957-70.
Krugman, P., Geography and Trade (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1991).
Mansfield, E., “Sources and Characteristics of Academic Research Underlying
Industrial Innovations,” mimeo, University of Pennsylvania, 1991.
Marshall, A., Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan, 1920).
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development, Office of Science and
Technology, State Technology Programs in the United States, 1988.
Romer, P., “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political
Economy, XCIV (1986), 1002-37.
“Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, XCVIII
(1990), S71-S102.
Smilor, R., G. Kozmetsky, and D. Gibson, Creating the Technopolis: Linking
Technology, Commercialization and Economic Development (Cambridge, MA:
Ballinger Publishing Co., 1988).
Trajtenberg, M., “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of
Innovations,” Rand Journal of Economics, XXI (1990), 172-87.
Trajtenberg, M., R. Henderson, and A. Jaffe: “Ivory Tower Versus Corporate Lab:
An Empirical Study of Basicness and Appropriability,” NBER Working Paper
No. 4146, 1992.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT ??