Topic: term paperOrder DescriptionIndustry: Food, Drink and TobaccoFirm: Coca-Cola enterprisesHarm: Soft drink is harmful to peoples’ health in a number of ways; high risk of obesity, blood sugar disorders, diabetes, nutritional deficiencies, eating complications, tooth decay, bone fractures, osteoporosis, food addictions, adrenal issues as a result of the caffeine in the soft drinks, and neurotransmitter dysfunction from the chemically modified sweeteners.Here is what the rest of the project assignment looks like:Based on your problem statement, as revised from feedback, briefly describe at least three properties of the globalization of your product or service that are beneficial (and which stakeholders benefit from each property).Next, describe at least three properties of your product/service that are harmful (and which stakeholders are harmed).Conclude by reflecting on whether the “net calculus” of your chosen global product/service is beneficial or harmful, and for whom. Is it worth the price of the harms to obtain the benefits? How might overly harmful situations that you encounter be addressed? In situations where benefits exist, but are unevenly or unfairly distributed, how would you (again in your role-play as managers of your chosen organization) address these issues? What are the issues involved in developing a “calculus” of benefits and harms? How do these create issues for determining if a corporate (or other) activity is net harmful or beneficial?Requirements and Tips:Use our textbook for help understanding specific related-areas, or go beyond the book and use outside sources.Length: 8 pages maximum, all-inclusive (includes references, title page (if any), figures, tables, text, appendices). Double spaced, times New Roman Font, 1 inch margins at top, bottom, left and right.We will NOT READ more than the FIRST 8 PAGES SUBMITTED, including title pages and Tables of Contents. You do not need a Table of Contents for this paper.The goal of a paper is to be persuasive (convincing). Persuade the reader (your Prof.) that your conclusion is correct. Evidence is the absolute best way to do this. In this assignment, stories of how benefits or harms have unfolded over time could be very helpful. Outsiders’ reports on problems in your area are also useful. You will need to do some digging. See the Syllabus and top of this web page for Library resources (people) you can contact via email for help.this is structure of the final paper:Dear IBUS 130 Students:I write today to offer you some advice on the structure of the final project paper. This is a portion of a reply I made to Elsa Sjöborg.Thanks to her for this timely material–Q: What heading/subheading structure, if any, should I use on my Final Project Paper for IBUS 130?A: Thanks for asking. See below for some thoughts.A title is good. A title page is not needed for a work this length.Major headings are a good idea, at least indicating some basic structure like, say, for example,The ProblemThree HarmsThree BenefitsDiscussionConclusionSubheadings can also be useful, again, for example:The ProblemThree HarmsHarm 1–causes cancerHarm 2–ruins the airHarm 3–unsustainably sourcedThree BenefitsBenefit 1–saves livesBenefit 2–gives great joy to peopleBenefit 3–future prospects for sustainable sourcesDiscussionThe evidenceAssessment/argument for “net” harm/benefitConclusionFindingsPossible issues with this workFuture directions for this inquiryThese are examples of a heading/subheading structure. The first is single-heading structured, while the second is two-headings deep. One of these might work for some folks’ final projects, but it is mainly intended as an example of structure, not content–figure out the headings/subheadings that make your work convincing.You can try a running narrative with no headings, but it should be exceptionally well-written and engaging. I prefer to be beaten over the head with signs of the structure (headings and subheads).That said, I do not think you need to go three levels of headings deep on a paper of the assigned length.