Sport And Recreation Event Management
1. 2000 words
1. Demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of relevant sport event programme planning approaches applicable to the provision of sport events.
2. Deliver and evaluate a sport event that is informed by appropriate theory
| Submission Deadline
|
Marks and Feedback
|
| Before 10am on:
21/05/2021
|
20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7) 15 working days after deadline (L6) 10 working days after deadline (block delivery)
05/06/2020 |
| Unit title & code
|
Sport and Recreation Event Management SPO075-2 |
| Assignment number and title
|
1 |
| Assignment type
|
Individual Portfolio |
| Weighting of assignment | 100% |
| Size or length of assessment
|
2,000 Words |
| Unit learning outcomes
|
1. Demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of relevant sport event programme planning approaches applicable to the provision of sport events.
2. Deliver and evaluate a sport event that is informed by appropriate theory
|
| What am I required to do in this assignment?
|
| PORTFOLIO – SUBMIT 4 FROM 6 REFLECTIVE EXERCISES / COMPLETE ATHLETE 365 COURSE / REFLECTIVE REPORT
This assessment aims to enhance student awareness of the vocational opportunities available in sport and recreation event management and the associated desirable skills; allowing you to develop reflective practice, critical evaluation and work based compentancies. You will produce a portfolio that will detail from a management perspective an evaluation of the selected event. You will produce a portfolio of work comprising of a detailed report of the event including in its appendices any raw data collected. It should consider (as a minimum) the following · The Event Lifecycle: Planning · The Event Lifecycle: Marketing · The Event Lifecycle: Implementation · The Event Lifecycle: Wrap-up processes · Project evaluation · Personal reflection
|
| What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
|
|
Apply theoretical issues relating to relevant aspects of sport and recreation management to a sport event. Analyse the ways in which key management approaches are practiced within the sport industry |
| How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
|
| A critical review of the organisation’s current event practice (including product and service portfolio/provision), as well as an examination of the internal and external environments so as to 1) establish the degree to which there is a ‘strategic fit’ between event planning practice and business environment and 2) generate a range of viable, evidence-based, evaluations. This will necessitate the considered use of key strategic analysis tools, as well as the appropriate use of supportive literature.
It is important to note the assessment task requires you to “critically review” the organisation’s event planning practice. This requires that you do not simply state/describe what the organisation does, but also why and how it does it; you must be sure to draw upon multiple sources and relevant evidence to establish the viability – the strategic fit – of the organisation’s mode and scope of business as it is set against what is a changing industry context. This is an evidence-based exercise and as such it is expected that you draw upon a wide-variety of information sources, i.e., policy documents, industry periodical articles, as well as academic publications (book chapters and journal articles). In short, show your working!
|
| How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions? |
| The unit sessions combines formal “summative” (individually case study and project work) and regular informal “formative” (problem-based, cooperative and reflective) modes of delivery, drawing also upon peer review and peer support techniques throughout the unit, so as to emphasise and develop individual as well as collaborative student learning,
|
| How will my assignment be marked?
|
|
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
|
| 3rd Class – 40-49%
|
Lower 2nd – 50-59%
|
Upper 2nd – 60-69%
|
1st Class – 70%+
|
|
| 1 | Adequate level of analysis that provides an overview of the sport event. Only one strategic analysis tool used and applied.
|
Satisfactory level of analysis. Some use of critical evaluation. At least two strategic analysis tools are used and applied correctly
|
A good analysis is provided that is supported by a critical evaluation. At least three strategic analysis tools are used to provide a comprehensive analysis and critique of the sport event business.
|
Authoritative understanding and exploration of the topic. A range of strategic analysis tools are included to provide a well balance critique
|
| 2 | Clarity of work may be compromised by limited expression and vocabulary or errors. Structure may be poor and referencing inconsistent.
|
Work shows a sound structure which is logical and clear. Some errors may be evident. Sound referencing style with occasional inaccuracies. | Work shows a good structure and is accurate, fluent and clear. Referencing is consistent and accurate.
|
Work shows a sophisticated structure. It is concise and fluent. Arguments are comprehensively supported with an accurate referencing style.
|
| 3 | Some ability to construct critical evaluation. Development of argument may be flawed by some irrelevance or omission.
|
Sound construction of argument showing evidence of critical evaluation. Recommendations are presented but require more development.
|
Clear evidence of critical evaluation and development of ideas to support recommendations.
|
Can sustain a rigorous and insightful argument through consistent critical evaluation and presentation of appropriate recommendations.
|
| 4 | Some ability to apply wider sports policy. Application is flawed by inappropriate application or lack of detail.
|
Sound positioning and use of wider sports policy but requires more development.
|
Good positioning of work within the sports sector. Provides a reasoned application of the wider sports policy.
|
Excellent positioning of work within the sport sector. Draws on a range of policies and applies them appropriately to the sport business.
|
| 5 | Some ability to reflect nature of sports event industry. Little evidence of collaboration / knowledge exchanges. Weak discussion relation to future performance. .
|
Is able to reflect on the sport industry. Little evidence of active collaboration or knowledge exchange. Some discussion relating to future performance is evident. Conclusions are loosely supported by evidence.
|
Offers a good reflection of the sport industry. A good review of collaboration and knowledge exchange is included, and evidence provided. Is able to develop recommendations to improve future performance. Conclusions are supported by evidences, although some discrepancies are evident.
|
Offers excellent reflection of their role and analysis of the sports industry. Provides an excellent review and evidence of knowledge exchange. Recommendations and limitations of the project is considered.
|
3
Marks and feedback
Marks and feedback
Submit assignment
Completing Your Assignment
Marks and Feedback
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
