Fill in Order Details

  • Submit paper details for free using our simple order form

Make Payment Securely

  • Add funds to your account. There are no upfront payments. The writer will only be paid once you have approved your paper

Writing Process

  • The best qualified expert writer is assigned to work on your order
  • Your paper is written to standard and delivered as per your instructions

Download your paper

  • Download the completed paper from your online account or your email
  • You can request a plagiarism and quality report along with your paper

SCI 207 week 5 lab

   Ashford 7: – Week 5 – Laboratory

Weather and Climate Change
 

Carefully review the Grading Rubric before beginning the assignment.
 

Read “Lab 5: Weather and Climate Change.” This lab will allow you to explore the water cycle through the creation of an ecosystem model. Additionally, you will observe how water moves throughout the environment and is affected by weather patterns. Then, you will utilize this information and your eScience lab kit to complete Demonstration 1and Experiment 1 on the Week Five Lab Reporting Form. Make sure to complete all of the following items before submission: Read through the introductory material.  Perform Demonstration 1: Modeling the Water Cycle      using your eScience lab manual and kit.         Answer Post Lab Questions 1 through 3 in complete      sentences on the Week Five Lab Reporting Form.  Complete Experiment 1: Water Movement using your eScience lab manual and kit.         Answer Post Lab Questions 1 through 5 in complete      sentences on the Week Five Lab Reporting Form. 

Submit the Week Five Lab Reporting Form via Waypoint. The document does not need to include a title page or other APA formatting; however, if you utilize any outside sources in your answers you must reference these sources in proper APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.  SCI207.W5L1.08.2013

Description: 

Total Possible Score: 7.00 Demonstration 1, Question 1: Describes Which Water Cycle Processes Are Represented in This Model

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately and thoroughly describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components.

Proficient – Describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components. Although the response is thorough, minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components. Intermediate details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components. Major details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Fails to describe which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components. Demonstration 1, Question 2: Describes Which Water Cycle Processes Are not Represented in This Model

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately and thoroughly describes which processes are not represented in the model and details how to alter the model to include these processes.

Proficient – Describes which processes are not represented in the model and details how to alter the model to include these processes. Although the response is thorough, minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Describes which processes are not represented in the model and details how to alter the model to include these processes. Intermediate details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Describes which processes are not represented in the model and details how to alter the model to include these processes. Major details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Fails to describe which processes are not represented in the model and detail how to alter the model to include these processes. Demonstration 1, Question 3: Describes How Weather Would Be Affected if the Water Temperature Increased and Decreased

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately and thoroughly describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and if it was decreased.

Proficient – Describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and if it was decreased. Although the response is thorough, minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and if it was decreased. Intermediate details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and if it was decreased. Major details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Fails to describe how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and if it was decreased. Experiment 1, Question 1: Develops a Hypothesis on the Effect of Sunlight on Evaporation

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Develops a logical hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation.

Proficient – Develops a mostly logical hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation. Minor errors in hypothesis format are present.

Basic – Develops a hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation. Major errors in hypothesis format are present.

Below Expectations – Develops a hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation. Hypothesis fails to properly address the experimental question.

Non-Performance – Fails to develop a hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation. Experiment 1, Question 2: Accepts or Rejects Hypothesis and Explains How This Was Determined

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately accepts or rejects the hypothesis proposed in Question 1 and thoroughly explains how this was determined.

Proficient – Accurately accepts or rejects the hypotheses proposed in Question 1 and explains how this was determined. Minor details of the explanation are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Accurately accepts or rejects the hypotheses proposed in Question 1 and explains how this was determined. Intermediate details of the explanation are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Accepts or rejects the hypotheses proposed in Question 1 and explains how this was determined. Explanation contradicts the acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis or major inaccuracies are present in the explanation.

Non-Performance – Fails to accept or reject the hypothesis proposed in Question 1. Experiment 1, Question 3: Describes What Parts of the Water Cycle Are Represented

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately and thoroughly describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment.

Proficient – Describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment. Although the response is thorough, minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment. Intermediate details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment. Major details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Fails to describe what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment. Experiment 1, Question 4: Describes How Increasing the Amount of Land Would Affect the Amount of Water Vapor Released

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately and thoroughly describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released.

Proficient – Describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released. Although the response is thorough, minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released. Intermediate details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released. Major details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Fails to describe how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released. Experiment 1, Question 5: Describes How Drought Conditions Would Impact Infiltration and Evaporation

Total: 0.85

Distinguished – Accurately and thoroughly describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil.

Proficient – Describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil. Although the response is thorough, minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil. Intermediate details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil. Major details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Fails to describe how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil. Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.20

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

WHAT OUR CURRENT CUSTOMERS SAY

  • Google
  • Sitejabber
  • Trustpilot
Zahraa S
Zahraa S
Absolutely spot on. I have had the best experience with Elite Academic Research and all my work have scored highly. Thank you for your professionalism and using expert writers with vast and outstanding knowledge in their fields. I highly recommend any day and time.
Stuart L
Stuart L
Thanks for keeping me sane for getting everything out of the way, I’ve been stuck working more than full time and balancing the rest but I’m glad you’ve been ensuring my school work is taken care of. I'll recommend Elite Academic Research to anyone who seeks quality academic help, thank you so much!
Mindi D
Mindi D
Brilliant writers and awesome support team. You can tell by the depth of research and the quality of work delivered that the writers care deeply about delivering that perfect grade.
Samuel Y
Samuel Y
I really appreciate the work all your amazing writers do to ensure that my papers are always delivered on time and always of the highest quality. I was at a crossroads last semester and I almost dropped out of school because of the many issues that were bombarding but I am glad a friend referred me to you guys. You came up big for me and continue to do so. I just wish I knew about your services earlier.
Cindy L
Cindy L
You can't fault the paper quality and speed of delivery. I have been using these guys for the past 3 years and I not even once have they ever failed me. They deliver properly researched papers way ahead of time. Each time I think I have had the best their professional writers surprise me with even better quality work. Elite Academic Research is a true Gem among essay writing companies.
Got an A and plagiarism percent was less than 10%! Thanks!

ORDER NOW


Consider Your Assignments Done

“All my friends and I are getting help from eliteacademicresearch. It’s every college student’s best kept secret!”

Jermaine Byrant
BSN

“I was apprehensive at first. But I must say it was a great experience and well worth the price. I got an A!”

Nicole Johnson
Finance & Economics

Our Top Experts

See Why Our Clients Hire Us Again And Again!


OVER

10.3k
Reviews

RATING
4.89/5
Average

YEARS
13
Mastery

Success Guarantee

When you order form the best, some of your greatest problems as a student are solved!

Reliable

Professional

Affordable

Quick

Using this writing service is legal and is not prohibited by any law, university or college policies. Services of Elite Academic Research are provided for research and study purposes only with the intent to help students improve their writing and academic experience. We do not condone or encourage cheating, academic dishonesty, or any form of plagiarism. Our original, plagiarism-free, zero-AI expert samples should only be used as references. It is your responsibility to cite any outside sources appropriately. This service will be useful for students looking for quick, reliable, and efficient online class-help on a variety of topics.