Case Study

Robotic surgery sounds like the ultimate in safe, efficient and effective 21st-century health care.

Instead of a surgeon’s potentially fallible human hand, you have a robot with its precision-built

mechanical arms able to perform micro-accurate procedures on tissues deep within the body.

With robot-assisted surgery, the surgeon sits at a nearby console with a 3D view of the surgical

site. Computer technology translates their hand movements into precise manoeuvres of the

instruments. If the surgeon’s hand develops a tremor, the computer system knows to ignore it.

Page 2

CRICOS Provider No. 00103D

The technology also means surgeons can use finer instruments that cause less damage to the

body. In turn, this should reduce blood loss and the need for blood transfusions – and mean that

patients recover more quickly. With this kind of promise, little wonder that multi-million-pound

robot machines are performing ever more operations across Britain.

The technology, which was first used in 2000, is employed increasingly in intricate surgery such

as hysterectomy, gallbladder removal and repair of damaged heart valves.

But while for many patients robot surgery will have been entirely smooth, the technology is not

risk-free. And leading experts are now voicing growing fears about its safety and effectiveness,

warning of a growing human toll.

Good Health has learned of one particularly alarming case in which a man suffered grievous

injuries from a robotic procedure that nearly killed him when it went wrong.

The patient, who can’t be named for legal reasons, was suffering from prostate cancer and

recently had his prostate gland removed by keyhole surgery using robot technology. His solicitors

say the remote camera attached to the robot arm damaged the man’s bowel, leading to severe

infection, organ failure and cardiac arrest (Nash, 2013).
id=”slidingDiv”>
id=”divAttachment” class=”answer”>

Attachments:

id=”divAssignmentAttachment”>
class=”AttachmentBox”>
1-itech-7400-….pdf

class=”clear”>