This is not an English assignment!!!

This posting should reflect your evaluation of “Deny the Consent to be Governed: Risk Leadership Theory” by FHSU’s own Brungardt and Crawford. These are the guidance:

What was the authors’ thesis? What does their idea mean?

What is the basis for their thesis, and do their ideas flow logically from their basis?

What are the implications of the ideas presented in this book? For leaders?  For people studying leadership?

What did you find positive? What did you find negative?

Please remember that you must support your observations and assertions. This is an important criteria in my evaluation of your work. Within the length constraints, I appreciate full and complete responses.

Please also remember that it is a requirement of the assignment to respond with a question, comment, observation, etc to at least one of your classmates and to answer those posed to you. You must do so to receive full credit.

Finally, please note. Postings that only meet the minimum requirements will generally not receive full credit.