Need an research paper on an american empire is better than its alternatives. Needs to be 11 pages. Please no plagiarism. Law on the international level is dependent on a state’s acceptance to be subjected to the enforcement of laws. States must be willing to subject themselves into the international legal process. In international law, there is no single enforcement mechanism, which sometimes causes individuals to question the validity of international law. They question whether international law is a fundamental requirement of a modern, increasingly independent, global system of states and non-state actors. They question whether international law stops them from pursuing their self-interest (Damrosch et al 2001 p 14). In modern times, because of globalism, international law is a fundamental requirement for international relations. In the last 100 years, history has shown us that the absence of such laws can have detrimental consequences on the entire world.

The Bush administration has insisted on its right to unilaterally attack Iraq. To justify this end, the administration either ignored or conveniently reinterpreted UN articles or resolutions. It is no wonder that the vast majority of the international community did not support the Bush administration’s conclusions. International opinion was that the attack on Iraq was illegal under the international laws of the UN.&nbsp.

The United States has clearly defined its foreign policy’s objectives and goals. While some groups claim that the United States acts as an isolationist body, the government works to improve the international community through negotiation and the cooperation The United States maintains relations with nearly every nation-state in the international system. The US also conducts frequent relations with many international organizations for a lot of different reasons

While the United States has hundreds of goals and objectives of the foreign policy, it’s most important goals currently are internationalism and multilateralism, national security, and limiting weapons of mass destruction (Walter 2001 p 2).