The maintenance of and improvement of worker health and well-being is now a major objective of the safety and health professional, sometimes as much as protecting workers and preventing work-related injuries and illnesses. Stress at work is an issue that safety professionals are addressing to improve worker health and well-being. For more information on stress at work, view the NIOSH Stress at Work (Links to an external site.) website.
For this assignment, develop a strategy that could be implemented by safety professionals, using the Principles of Healthy and Productive Organizations found in your reading assignment in the text. This strategy should clearly identify the principles that will be addressed, how the strategy will be carried out within a work organization, and the expected benefits of the strategy. Be sure to view the 4.3 Work Stress Strategy rubric prior to completing the assignment. The assignment should be submitted in APA format. The submission should be limited to 5 pages of text, not including cover page, abstract, references, etc.
Please save your file as ‘LastName_Asgn_4_3.doc(x)’ (example ‘Jones_Asgn_4_3.doc’)
Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity.
Rubric
SFTY 619 4.3 Work Stress Strategy Rubric
SFTY 619 4.3 Work Stress Strategy Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, Spelling, Etc. – Up to 10 Points
|
| 10.0 pts
Excellent (9-10) | The student always followed APA format and appropriately cited work and provided references. Very few, if any, grammatical errors and mistakes.
|
8.0 pts
Average (6-8 points) | The student usually followed APA format and usually properly cited work and provided references. Few grammatical errors and mistakes.
|
5.0 pts
Below Average (3-5) | The student sometimes followed APA format and did not always properly cite work and/or provide adequate references. Grammatical errors and mistakes were common.
|
2.0 pts
Poor (0-2) | The student failed to follow APA format, did not include citations and references. Frequent grammatical errors.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategy Details – Up to 90 Points
|
| 90.0 pts
Excellent (81-90) | The student developed an excellent strategy that could be implemented by safety professionals. The Principles of Healthy and Productive Organizations were thoroughly incorporated. The strategy clearly identified the principles that will be addressed. How the strategy will be carried out was thoroughly detailed and presented. The expected benefits were presented in an excellent format and were justified.
|
80.0 pts
Average (71-80) | The student developed a satisfactory strategy that could be implemented by safety professionals. The Principles of Healthy and Productive Organizations were moderately incorporated. The strategy identified the principles that will be addressed. How the strategy will be carried out was satisfactorily described. Expected benefits were presented in an satisfactory format and were justified for the most part.
|
70.0 pts
Below Average (61-70) | The student developed a strategy, but it did not meet expectations. The Principles of Healthy and Productive Organizations not completely addressed. The strategy inadequately identified the principles that will be addressed. How thestrategy will be carried out lacked detail. The expected benefits were poorly presented and were not well justified.
|
60.0 pts
Poor (0-60) | The student developed a strategy, but it failed to meet expectations. The Principles of Healthy and Productive Organizations were not addressed. The strategy poorly identified the principles that will be addressed. How the strategy will be carried out was poorly designed and lacked detail. The expected benefits were not presented or were poorly presented and were not well justified.
|
|
90.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
<a href="https://erau.instructure.com/courses/104771/modules/items/5836754" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" 4.2 – Video: Reinventing Management for the 21st Century” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>Previous
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
