Police Officers Of World Paper

Military action against SyriaThe Obama administration moved fifth destroyers containing travel missiles into the Mediterranean Sea and the administration is prepared to take restricted punishing military action against Syria for presumed usage of chemical arms by Bashar al-Assad’s regime. White house declassified evidence which revealed that Assad’s forces indeed used poisonous gas attack against the civilians and killed over 1,300 civilians. In the year 2011 president Obama set the “red line” stating that use of chemical arms will not be accepted in Syrian civil war, which has raged for more than two years and has caused death of 100,000 civilian. However, with Britain refusal to give support to a retaliatory strike, some Congress members are wondering whether use of chemical arms is an automatic justification for America to enter into war. In 1925, following large-scale use of tear gas, nerve gas, as well as other deadly agents in World War 1, nations signed the Geneva protocol prohibiting use of gas as the means of warfare on the grounds. Using chemical arms is a war crime under Statute of International Criminal Court.

Contents

TOC o “1-3” h z u HYPERLINK l “_Toc377020636” Military action against Syria PAGEREF _Toc377020636 h 1

HYPERLINK l “_Toc377020637” War on terrorism PAGEREF _Toc377020637 h 1

HYPERLINK l “_Toc377020638” Two factors that propelled America into a dominant military and diplomatic force after World War II PAGEREF _Toc377020638 h 2

HYPERLINK l “_Toc377020639” American foreign policy before and after World War II PAGEREF _Toc377020639 h 2

HYPERLINK l “_Toc377020640” How justifications for America’s involvement during World War II still play a role in America military action abroad. PAGEREF _Toc377020640 h 3

HYPERLINK l “_Toc377020641” Fundamental ways in which the rise of the United States to a world superpower has shaped the country’s responses to PAGEREF _Toc377020641 h 4

War on terrorismOver the past decade, the al Qaeda has developed a practice of utilizing operatives with legal entrance to the United States and Western nations to aim their nations of origin; for instance, al-Qaeda organized American legal permanent inhabitant Najibullah Zazi to attack New York City in 2009. Counterterrorism efforts against the al Qaeda in Pakistan began with the Operation Enduring Freedom in the year 2001. The operation has resulted in loss of key trainers and leaders thus, making it difficult for al Qaeda to communicate, train operatives, and transfer funds. America has significant successes in fighting terrorism threat, the most visible be that of May 2, 2011 that led to death of Osama Bin Ladin the leader of al Qaeda.

Two factors that propelled America into a dominant military and diplomatic force after World War IIAfter World War II, the United States military force faced numerical peaks during the early days of the Cold War and later in Vietnam, the entire number of aircraft declined swiftly with a drawdown in Asia and a collapse of Soviet empire. As the capacity of air force shrank under fiscal and strategic guidance, the military force shifted from quality to quantity and emphasized on fewer aircrafts. This approach worked well as Air Force together with defense industry continued modifying aircrafts with the changing sophisticated sensors and exactness weapons.

The 1974 Brookings research on United States tactical air concluded that tactical air forces received fewer aircrafts, and modernization was happening slowly since the emphasis on United States conventional competences was renewed at beginning of 1960s. The turn to conventional prevention was prompted by the national military strategy of a “Flexible Response,” that departed from nuclear-intensive “New Look” of the Eisenhower Administration.

American foreign policy before and after World War IIImmediately after World War I, United States dug a deep hole of the economic despair, after this despair the country was not willing to be hurt again by another war. However, fifteen years before World WAR II, America’s foreign policy became isolationist. The country sought to keep itself out of problems around the world. To support this position, many historical legislations and actions were presented. Some of legislations that supported the American isolationism were Immigration Acts, which stated how many people from every race should migrate to America.

After World War II, the foreign policy greatly changed. America realized that has the responsibility of promoting peace in the world. Passage of Marshall Plan was the greatest type of isolationism after the war, because America agreed to give funds to “war-torn” countries in Europe. The foreign policies of America before and after World War II immensely differed. These two completely different periods in history needed two entirely different courses of action. America was isolationist before World War II but after the war, America was an intervener.

How justifications for America’s involvement during World War II still play a role in America military action abroad.After World War II, America became committed to an active internationalist agenda and pursued it even before the Soviet Union emerged as the ideological and geopolitical rival. Although interventionists promoted humanitarian reasons for United States involvement, they understood their main arguments in terms of maintenance a set of values that have been associated with the world order. These principles include preserving the inviolability of borders, punishing aggression, and preventing instability. In year 1966 John McNaughton, the defense secretary observed that it required some sophistication to understand how Vietnam automatically involved America interests. Just like the case of Vietnam, arguments for America’s intervention in the Balkans were so complex that they made sense only in the broader context of a United States pursuit of world order, which will safeguard purported economic and strategic interests. The main justification of why America involved itself World War II was that America believed that “good guys” win, while “bad guys” lose, and that in the international affairs “good nations win wars,” while “bad nations lose the war. In this view, Americans were encouraged to believe that America role in defeating Japan and Germany demonstrated righteousness of “American way” and superiority of United States society and government.

Fundamental ways in which the rise of the United States to a world superpower has shaped the country’s responses toDomestic spending

On the domestic front, after World War II the America economy grew swiftly, with broad spread prosperity, increase in wages, and movement of many farmers to cities and towns. After the war, America reconverted the war machine back to consumer culture within a short period and created jobs for over 12 million veterans. Most people enjoyed larger houses, higher wages, better schools, and home comforts such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners.

Fourth Amendment protections

After America became a superpower, the election rules were amended and a candidate who managed to win the highest number of nationwide votes but fail to win the highest number of votes in Electoral College could not become the American president. Amendments were made that gave independence to three arms of governments and the president was denied the power to dissolve Congress and call for special elections. Declaration of Independence established the United States as an independent political entity, and constitution created the basic structure of federal government. United States ‘whipping system’ was introduced that instructed members of the House of representative and senate on the way to vote.

Americans’ choice of leaders in Congress and White House

Considerations influence voting patterns of Congress members include;

Constituent views: Congress members regularly visit their districts or states to remain in touch with constituent views. Some pay greater attention than another does, even though they all consider the constituent views.

Party views: The congress is normally organized along party lines; therefore, party membership is a major determinant of the member vote. It amazes that senators and representatives vote along party lines.

Personal views: People who believe that the personal views are important argue that individuals vote for candidates they think have respectable judgment. Representatives therefore exercise their personal views freely.