Fill in Order Details

  • Submit paper details for free using our simple order form

Make Payment Securely

  • Add funds to your account. There are no upfront payments. The writer will only be paid once you have approved your paper

Writing Process

  • The best qualified expert writer is assigned to work on your order
  • Your paper is written to standard and delivered as per your instructions

Download your paper

  • Download the completed paper from your online account or your email
  • You can request a plagiarism and quality report along with your paper

Please see description…

This is for a Psych Statistical course called “Tests and Measurements” I need someone with the knowledge and ability to do and complete work ON TIME over the next few weeks using SPSS software. I will need to be able to send you additional infer throughout the way in order for you to have all the info needed to complete the assignments properly. Data Collection Introduction What does it mean to say that someone is tall or short or to say that a person’s cholesterol level is high or low? Relative descriptions such as these only have meaning because an individual is being compared to a reference group. An American woman with a height of 70 inches might be considered tall because she is being compared to other American women. A man with the same height would be considered average if compared to other American men. If that same man were on a basketball team, he might be considered short. Along the same lines, it is only meaningful to talk about high and low test scores when the scores are compared to a standard. A frequently used standard is the scores of a normative sample. This week, you explore characteristics of a good normative sample and examine how to address sampling considerations related to psychological tests. Objectives Students will: • Analyze sampling considerations related to psychological tests • Justify the use of sampling and data collection methods for psychological testing situations Discussion 1: Sampling In order to compare individuals to a population, that population must be sampled using a standardization sample, also referred to as a norm group. This group represents the population for which a test is intended. There are a number of important considerations when choosing a test’s standardization sample, such as how large your sample needs to be and how you plan to access your participants and induce them to participate. You may also need to consider whether the participants should be representative of the general population or of a specialized subpopulation and how diverse the sample should be. You may have general norms or separate norms according to demographic characteristics, such as age and gender. How to address these considerations depends on the goals of your assessment and will affect the test interpretation. With these thoughts in mind: 1. Post an explanation of the THREE most important considerations related to sampling that you would need to address in your *Final Project. 2. Explain how you might ensure that your sample represents the population of interest. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources. Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. Than… Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways: • Ask a probing question. • Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting. • Offer and support an opinion. • Validate an idea with your own experience. • Make a suggestion. • Expand on your colleague’s posting. Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made. Discussion 2: Optimizing Sampling and Data Collection The data that you collect from your norm group are called normative data. These data allow you to see what the results of your test instrument should be, so that you have a standardized score against which to compare others. In other words, the data allow you to equate scores across different tests of the same construct and let you compare individuals to each other. Now that you have considered sampling the population of interest for your proposed test instrument, you explore how you might optimally define your sample and collect your data if you had unlimited resources. Although it may not always be possible for practical reasons to do this in real life, this exercise nevertheless provides you with a valuable thought experiment. As you complete this experiment, keep in mind that even with optimal sample definition and data collection, test norms are not absolute. They can change with time or with a different norm group. With these thoughts in mind: 1. Post a description of the information you anticipate collecting through your proposed Final Project instrument. 2. Then explain how you would optimally define your sample and collect your data if you had unlimited resources. 3. Finally, explain advantages and disadvantages of your chosen data collection method. Support your response using the Learning Resources and the current literature. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources. Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. Than… Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways: • Ask a probing question. • Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting. • Offer and support an opinion. • Validate an idea with your own experience. • Make a suggestion. • Expand on your colleague’s posting. Readings • Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kline, T., Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Copyright 2005 Sage Publications Inc. Books. Used with permission from Sage Publications via the Copyright Clearance Center. Chapter 4, “Collecting Data: Sampling and Screening” • Buchanan, T., Ali, T., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., Parrott, A. C., Rodgers, J., & Scholey, A. B. (2005). Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the prospective memory questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 148–154.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. • Naglieri, J., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A., & Velasquez, R. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychologist, 59(3), 150–162.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

WHAT OUR CURRENT CUSTOMERS SAY

  • Google
  • Sitejabber
  • Trustpilot
Zahraa S
Zahraa S
Absolutely spot on. I have had the best experience with Elite Academic Research and all my work have scored highly. Thank you for your professionalism and using expert writers with vast and outstanding knowledge in their fields. I highly recommend any day and time.
Stuart L
Stuart L
Thanks for keeping me sane for getting everything out of the way, I’ve been stuck working more than full time and balancing the rest but I’m glad you’ve been ensuring my school work is taken care of. I'll recommend Elite Academic Research to anyone who seeks quality academic help, thank you so much!
Mindi D
Mindi D
Brilliant writers and awesome support team. You can tell by the depth of research and the quality of work delivered that the writers care deeply about delivering that perfect grade.
Samuel Y
Samuel Y
I really appreciate the work all your amazing writers do to ensure that my papers are always delivered on time and always of the highest quality. I was at a crossroads last semester and I almost dropped out of school because of the many issues that were bombarding but I am glad a friend referred me to you guys. You came up big for me and continue to do so. I just wish I knew about your services earlier.
Cindy L
Cindy L
You can't fault the paper quality and speed of delivery. I have been using these guys for the past 3 years and I not even once have they ever failed me. They deliver properly researched papers way ahead of time. Each time I think I have had the best their professional writers surprise me with even better quality work. Elite Academic Research is a true Gem among essay writing companies.
Got an A and plagiarism percent was less than 10%! Thanks!

ORDER NOW


Consider Your Assignments Done

“All my friends and I are getting help from eliteacademicresearch. It’s every college student’s best kept secret!”

Jermaine Byrant
BSN

“I was apprehensive at first. But I must say it was a great experience and well worth the price. I got an A!”

Nicole Johnson
Finance & Economics

Our Top Experts

See Why Our Clients Hire Us Again And Again!


OVER

10.3k
Reviews

RATING
4.89/5
Average

YEARS
13
Mastery

Success Guarantee

When you order form the best, some of your greatest problems as a student are solved!

Reliable

Professional

Affordable

Quick

Using this writing service is legal and is not prohibited by any law, university or college policies. Services of Elite Academic Research are provided for research and study purposes only with the intent to help students improve their writing and academic experience. We do not condone or encourage cheating, academic dishonesty, or any form of plagiarism. Our original, plagiarism-free, zero-AI expert samples should only be used as references. It is your responsibility to cite any outside sources appropriately. This service will be useful for students looking for quick, reliable, and efficient online class-help on a variety of topics.