1.Development: Does the report show adequate development? In other words, have the writers delivered the report’s content thoroughly and explicitly, giving the reader more than enough information to be usable? Are the report’s sources of exceptional quality, and, if appropriate, does the writer include a mix of both general (e.g., Wikipedia) and specific (e.g., business database) resources? Respond with a comment of at least 25 words.

2. Format/Design: Based on the specifications listed in the Report Project Description, is the report formatted correctly? Does it rely on a model transparent design, with appropriate white space, heading structure, line spacing, graphics placement, highlighting and alignment? Does it look professional? Respond with a comment of at least 25 words, then use the PeerMark commenting feature to point out design and visual issues on the draft itself.

3. Persuasion/Rhetoric: Is the report sensitive to rhetorical concerns (audience, purpose and context)? In other words, if you are the target reader, are you convinced that a problem exists, that the report offers effective recommendations, and that those recommendations will provide a benefit to you or other readers? Respond with a comment of at least 25 words.

4. Writing/Style: Does the report demonstrate a sophisticated grasp of language in terms of both sentence structure and vocabulary? Does it offer a synthesis of researched information, a straightforward style with an easy-to-follow structure? Can you find errors in word usage, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization? Respond with a comment of at least 10 words. IMPORTANT: After you respond to this question, use the PeerMark commenting bubble to note all mechanical errors you can find on the draft.

5. Final Comment: Finally, please provide a summarizing comment of at least 100 words that both addresses the report draft’s success and offers specific strategies for revision. Also add any additional comments to specific parts of the draft before you save and submit your review. Use PeerMark’s commenting feature to complete this task. (Please take your time reflecting on this question. You will not get full credit for the review if you respond with fewer than 70 words here, and if you forget to comment on the draft itself.)