Introduction

A case study analysis requires that you investigate a business problem, examine the possible and/or alternative solutions, and propose the most effective solution using supporting evidence.

• Read and examine the case carefully.
• Focus on the issues/problems.
• Brainstorm possible solutions or changes that need to be made.
• Select the best solution with reasoning.

Unit Learning Outcomes

• Illustrate the importance of leading through obstacles (CLO 5).
• Recognize common team obstacles (CLO 5 and CLO 6).
• Examine the role of leaders, followers, and the context in toxic/destructive leadership (CLO 2, CLO 3, and CLO 5).

• • Coach Amy Rakers was the first female head coach of the varsity boys’ basketball team, the Kodiak Bears. Coach Rakers, as well as the athletic director, received negative comments and feedback from students, team members, fans, and other coaches that were not supportive of the decision to hire a female to lead a boys’ team. Rakers dealt with negative remarks that would be considered sexist and out of line. Though met with this challenge, Rakers was able to focus on coaching her team, teaching the game of basketball, and eventually getting to know the other coaches to obtain acceptance.The Kodiak Bears faced travel and budget issues as the school did not have a lot of money to allow students to travel, and since there was no real competition on the island in which this team was located, teams that they could potentially compete against had more of an advantage. In order to make up for this short coming, Coach Rakers taught her players the value of hard work and team spirit, helping those players to see that although other teams may have an advantage in ways that they are not privileged, they are privileged in other ways that these competing teams could never understand. Rakers ensured that her players understood their role within the team and the game, but also that they understood how their role played into the bigger picture within the team.Due to the hard work of the team, they went 25-0, making it to the championships. Because of the culture that was created by Coach Rankers, more than half of the town traveled to the championship game to support their team and community. The Kodiak Bears won their first championship and were later entered the Hall of Fame.

Directions

1. Read the full case study in the textbook: Case 13.2 The Improbably Kodiak Bears (The Kodiak basketball team faced a multitude of obstacles and challenges, yet the team, led by their coach did not lack motivation.)
2. Answer the case study discussion questions.
3. Submit your work for review.

Case Study Questions

1. List and briefly discuss the various obstacles and challenges faced by the team.
2. Discuss the obstacles Coach Rakers personally faced, how did she address them.
3. How did Coach Rakers assist her team in maintaining motivation in the face of these challenges using four leadership styles (directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented leadership) in response to those various types of challenges. In particular, how did Coach Rakers:
   • Help the team members feel confident?
   • Help them identify and meet their own expectations?
   • Help them to value what they did as a player and as a team?

Case Study Requirements

• Full points will be earned if the case study(s):
  • responds to every aspect of the assignment
  • contains fully developed answers
  • displays a familiarity with the related materials and topics being referenced
• Exhibit the ability to apply the related concepts to the case study.
• Each question warrants a response that is well developed and is well-formatted.
• At least one page in length, typed, and double spaced.
• All cited material must include both internal citations and a complete reference list at the end of the paper.

Due Date

• Submit by 11:59 p.m., Sunday, CT.

Rubric

Case Study Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues or Problems	10.0 ptsExcellentIdentifies and understands the main issues in the case study.9.0 ptsProficientIdentifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study.7.0 ptsSufficientIdentifies and understands some of the main issues in the case study.5.0 ptsDevelopingIdentifies and understands few of the main issues in the case study.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not clearly identify main issues in the case study.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and Review	10.0 ptsExcellentExcellent research with clearly documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.9.0 ptsProficientSatisfactory research with documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.7.0 ptsSufficientLimited research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.5.0 ptsDevelopingIncomplete research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryLittle or no research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Solution Options	10.0 ptsExcellentInsightful and thorough analysis of all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover all the key issues with descriptive well-reasoned and logical discussion.9.0 ptsProficientInsightful and thorough analysis of most all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover most the key issues with well-thought out reasoning and logical discussion.7.0 ptsSufficientInsightful and thorough analysis of some of the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover some of the key issues with solid reasoning and discussion.5.0 ptsDevelopingDeveloping analysis of the some of the key issues. Further development is needed. Alternative solutions/options cover few of the key issues with minimal reasoning and discussion.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryIncomplete analysis of the key issues. Incomplete solutions/options without sound reasoning or discussion.	10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Organization Format	10.0 ptsExcellentWriting is free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise, and creative presentation of ideas. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.9.0 ptsProficientWriting is mostly free of grammar and spelling errors. Most ideas are clearly presented. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.7.0 ptsSufficientWriting contains several spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented and organized. Sources are identified with errors in APA format.5.0 ptsDevelopingWriting contains many errors with grammatical mistakes. Ideas are difficult to follow. Sources are not identified or errors in APA format.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryErrors in grammar and spelling distract from the overall message. Ideas are incomplete. APA format was not used correctly.	10.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0