NURS 2010 Project
Top of Form
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics) The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A. Functional Differences The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the functional differences between a regulatory agency, such as a BRN, and a PNO as it pertains to the candidate’s professional nursing practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the functional differences between a regulatory agency, such as a BRN, and a PNO as it pertains to the candidate’s professional nursing practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the functional differences between a regulatory agency, such as a BRN, and a PNO as it pertains to the candidate’s professional nursing practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the functional differences between a regulatory agency, such as a BRN, and a PNO as it pertains to the candidate’s professional nursing practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the functional differences between a regulatory agency, such as a BRN, and a PNO as it pertains to the candidate’s professional nursing practice.
B. Nursing Code Examples The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of 2 examples of how provisions from a nursing code of ethics influence the candidate’s practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of 2 examples of how provisions from a nursing code of ethics influence the candidate’s practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of 2 examples of how provisions from a nursing code of ethics influence the candidate’s practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of 2 examples of how provisions from a nursing code of ethics influence the candidate’s practice. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of 2 examples of how provisions from a nursing code of ethics influence the candidate’s practice.
C. Professional Traits The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of 4 professional traits from the ANA Code of Ethics that the candidate will bring to an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of 4 professional traits from the ANA Code of Ethics that the candidate will bring to an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of 4 professional traits from the ANA Code of Ethics that the candidate will bring to an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of 4 professional traits from the ANA Code of Ethics that the candidate will bring to an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of 4 professional traits from the ANA Code of Ethics that the candidate will bring to an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals.
D. Nursing Theory The candidate does not identify a nursing theory that has influenced the candidate’s personal professional practice. Not applicable. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate identifies a nursing theory that has influenced the candidate’s personal professional practice.
D1. Theory in Professional Practice The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the chosen theory fits the candidate’s professional practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of how the chosen theory fits the candidate’s professional practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of how the chosen theory fits the candidate’s professional practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of how the chosen theory fits the candidate’s professional practice. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of how the chosen theory fits the candidate’s professional practice.
E. Contributions The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how the contributions of 1 historical nursing figure have impacted the candidate’s professional nursing practice, including modern-day application. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of how the contributions of 1 historical nursing figure have impacted the candidate’s professional nursing practice, including modern-day application. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of how the contributions of 1 historical nursing figure have impacted the candidate’s professional nursing practice, including modern-day application. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of how the contributions of 1 historical nursing figure have impacted the candidate’s professional nursing practice, including modern-day application. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of how the contributions of 1 historical nursing figure have impacted the candidate’s professional nursing practice, including modern-day application.
F. Scenario The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of a scenario in which the candidate safeguarded 2 of the given principles for the patient. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of a scenario in which the candidate safeguarded 2 of the given principles for the patient. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of a scenario in which the candidate safeguarded 2 of the given principles for the patient. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of a scenario in which the candidate safeguarded 2 of the given principles for the patient. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of a scenario in which the candidate safeguarded 2 of the given principles for the patient.
G. Sources When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.

I work as a Psych-Registered Nurse, at a Veterans Administration. I deal with Veterans with PTSD, Psych Disorders, Pain Management /Opiod/Drug Substance Abuse, and homeless vet, sucuidial and homocidial vets as well. Privacy, autonomy, Beneficiance are stickers for our veterans .. Just a little insight

.