It’s Case #7 in the textbook. It’s on Page 319.In your written case analysis, please follow the specified structure: Problem Statement – A concise summary of the most pressing issue or issue cluster presented in the case. This should be one to two sentences in length.Analysis – In this extended section, draw attention to facts that logically gave rise to the content of the ‘Problem Statement.’ Do NOT restate the case, only the relevant material that provides the basis for understanding the dynamics that gave rise to or indicate the nature of the ‘problem.’ See the Cengage description of important considerations in your analysis, including identification of ASSUMPTIONS. Be sure to address all relevant HR functional areas, such as, HRP, EEO, Job Analysis and Design, Staffing, Talent Management, Performance Management, Risk Management (Health & Safety), Compensation and Benefits, Labor and/or Employee Relations.Options – The first option is to continue with the firm’s current strategy, policies and procedures. The second and third options must be related to reasonable changes that are feasible. Their reasonableness should be rooted in HR theory and best practices.Recommendation – Compare and contrast the three options above on relevant bases such as costs of implementation and anticipated consequences. Be comprehensive in exploring likely financial, cultural and morale implications.When you get to Section IV: Recommendation,please state who your intended audience is. This is alwaysan important consideration as you tailor and edit the content – down to eachword. Do NOT write the recommendation for your instructor! Determine who in theorganization has the authority to make the change(s) you are recommending. Then,put yourself in that person’s or persons’ shoes so you can address their needsin order to persuade them to embrace your recommendation.