1. The term “integrated health promotion” refers to working in a collaborative manner with the client and the interprofessional team using a mix of health promotion interventions and competency-building strategies to address priority health and well-being issues to achieve quality patient outcomes.
Using the information you gathered during the Health History (M1A1) and Genogram (M3A1) assignments, you are now ready to create an integrated health promotion plan for the same individual.
Follow these instructions for completing the Integrated Health Promotion Plan. This assignment accounts for 25% of your course grade. Use the Integrated Health Promotion Plan Scoring Rubric for this assignment as a guide for writing your plan.
For this assignment:
1. Introduction: Write an introductory paragraph that includes the purpose, focus, and scope of the assignment.
2. Section One – Identification of Issues: Identify at least 2–3 health promotion and/or disease prevention priority issues related to the client’s real or perceived health problems or family risk factors based on the health assessment data collected for the Health History (Assignment I) and Genogram (Assignment II). To accurately identify the issues at hand, the nurse must be cognizant of the client and fully familiar with his/her health information. Thus, be sure to also
a. Identify the client and situate him/her as an individual and as an individual within a family, and
b. Clearly and accurately summarize the Health History and Genogram.
3. Section Two – Health Promotion Plan: Develop a caring, holistic, integrated, and culturally-competent health promotion plan that
a. Reflects an accurate and full understanding of the client (development, genetics, history, health beliefs and practices, heritage) and collaboration with the interprofessional team and client’s health issues (as identified in Section One), and
b. Includes 2–3 accurate and appropriate wellness interventions for each issue identified in Section One. Each intervention should have a corresponding Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC).
4.
4. Section Three – Evaluation of Plan:
a. For each issue identified in Section One, identify at least one expected outcome that will result from your Health Promotion Plan. Each expected outcome should have a corresponding Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).
b. Describe how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your Health Promotion Plan (e.g., have client come back in 3 weeks and weigh or calculate another body mass index). Evaluation should be specific, relevant, and reasonable.
5. Section Four – Research Integration: Select at least three current peer-reviewed journal articles (published within the past 5 years) that support the selected health issues or risks, identified interventions, and expected outcomes. At least two articles must be from nursing.
a. Explain the supporting rationales or evidenced-based practices from each article as it relates to your client.
b. Discuss how the article information contributes to nursing knowledge in the areas of health promotion and disease prevention.
6. Conclusion: Clearly summarize all the key points.
The Introduction and Conclusion should be in narrative form. However, you can create a chart or graph for Sections One through Four, but write in complete sentences.
This plan is limited to 5–8 pages (excluding the title page and references) and must reflect APA standards for formatting (e.g., title page, headings, references, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, usage) and writing consistent with Standard American English.
Submit your assignment to Turnitin
You are required to submit your paper to Turnitin to avoid plagiarism and ensure there are no inadvertent errors related to the proper citation of another author’s work. Instructions for submitting your paper to Turnitin can be found under Course Information and also at www.turnitin.com. Allow yourself time to submit your paper to Turnitin, review the Originality Report, make any necessary corrections, and resubmit to Turnitin prior to submitting your paper through the course assignment submission area for grading.
Review and Revision

Integrated health promotion plan Rubric
Identification of Issues

(15% of Grade)

(This criterion is used to measure SLPO #1.)–
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 15 (15%) – 15 (15%)
Fully describes the client and expertly situates him/her as an individual and within a family. Clearly and accurately summarizes the Health History and Genogram. Identifies more than 3 health promotion and/or disease prevention issues that are of primary concern and related to the client’s real or perceived health problems or family risk factors based on the health assessment data collected from the Health History and Genogram.
Mastery 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Identifies the client and appropriately situates him/her as an individual and within a family. Clearly and accurately summarizes the Health History and Genogram. Identifies 2 – 3 health promotion and/or disease prevention issues that are of primary concern and related to the client’s real or perceived health problems or family risk factors based on the health assessment data collected from the Health History and Genogram.
Developing 11 (11%) – 12 (12%)
Identifies the client and situates him/her as an individual and within a family. Summarizes the Health History and Genogram with a good degree of clarity and accuracy. Identifies 2 – 3 health promotion and/or disease prevention issues that are related to the client’s real or perceived health problems or family risk factors based on the health assessment data collected from the Health History or Genogram. At least one issue must be a primary health concern.
Begining 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Identifies the client and attempts to situate him/her as an individual or within a family. Summarizes the Health History and Genogram. Identifies at least 1 health promotion and/or disease prevention issue that is related to the client’s real or perceived health problems or family risk factors based on the health assessment data collected from the Health History or Genogram.
Incomplete 0 (0%) – 9 (9%)
Does not meet minimal standards or does not submit work.
Characteristics of a Comprehensive Health Promotion Plan (Section Two)

(20% of grade)

(This criterion is used to measure SLPO #1.)–
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 20 (20%) – 20 (20%)
Develops a caring, holistic, integrated, and culturally-competent health promotion plan that reflects an accurate, full understanding of the client (development, genetics, history, health beliefs and practices, heritage) and client’s health issues. Demonstrates understanding of the important conditions required to ensure successful implementation and collaboration with the interprofessional team.
Mastery 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
Develops a caring, holistic, integrated, and culturally-competent health promotion plan that reflects an accurate and full understanding of the client (development, genetics, history, health beliefs and practices, heritage) and interprofessional team and client’s health issues.
Developing 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Develops a health promotion plan that incorporates at least three of the five characteristics of a comprehensive plan: caring, holistic, integrated, culturally-competent, and accurate understanding of the client (development, genetics, history, health beliefs and practices, heritage) and client’s health issues.
Begining 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Develops a health promotion plan that incorporates at least two of the five characteristics of a comprehensive plan: caring, holistic, integrated, culturally-competent, and accurate understanding of the client (development, genetics, history, health beliefs and practices, heritage) and client’shealth issues.
Incomplete 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Does not meet minimal standards or does not submit work.
Specifications within a Comprehensive Health Promotion Plan

(20% of grade)

(This criterion is used to measure SLPO #3.)
Specifications within a Comprehensive Health Promotion Plan

(20% of grade)

(This criterion is used to measure SLPO #3.)–
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 20 (20%) – 20 (20%)
Includes 3 or more accurate and appropriate wellness interventions for each issue identified. Each intervention has an appropriate, corresponding Nursing Interventions Classification.
Mastery 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
Includes 2-3 accurate and appropriate wellness interventions for each issue identified. Each intervention has an appropriate, corresponding Nursing Interventions Classification.
Developing 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Includes at least 1 accurate and appropriate wellness intervention for each issue identified. Each intervention has a relevant, corresponding Nursing Interventions Classification.
Begining 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Includes at least 1 relevant wellness intervention. At least 1 intervention has a relevant, corresponding Nursing Interventions Classification.
Incomplete 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Does not meet minimal standards or does not submit work.
Evaluation of a Comprehensive Health Promotion Plan

(15% of Grade)

(This criterion is used to measure SLPO #3.)–
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 15 (15%) – 15 (15%)
Identifies 2 or more relevant expected outcomes for each defined issue and links the outcomes to an appropriate, corresponding Nursing Outcomes Classification. Provides a specific, relevant, and reasonable evaluation approach for the health promotion plan.
Mastery 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Identifies one relevant expected outcome for each defined issue and links the outcome to an appropriate, corresponding Nursing Outcomes Classification. Provides a specific, relevant, and reasonable evaluation approach for the health promotion plan.
Developing 11 (11%) – 12 (12%)
Identifies at least one relevant expected outcome and links the outcome to an appropriate, corresponding Nursing Outcomes Classification. Provides a somewhat relevant and reasonable evaluation approach for the health promotion plan.
Begining 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Identifies at least one relevant expected outcome and attempts to link the outcome to an appropriate Nursing Outcomes Classification. Provides a somewhat relevant evaluation approach for the health promotion plan.
Incomplete 0 (0%) – 9 (9%)
Does not meet minimal standards or does not submit work.
Integration of Research to Support Ideas Related to the Health Problem/Risk, Goals/Interventions, and Evaluation of Plan

(15% of Grade)

(This criterion is used to measure SLPO #2.)–
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 15 (15%) – 15 (15%)
Skillfully synthesizes high-quality, credible, relevant sources to support ideas appropriate for the assignment. Consistently uses information in ways that are true to original context. Always distinguishes between own ideas or common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution. Must include more than 3 peer-reviewed references from within last five years with at least 2 articles from nursing.
Mastery 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Consistently integrates credible, relevant sources to support ideas appropriate for the assignment. Consistently uses information in ways that are true to original context. Always distinguishes between own ideas or common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution. Must include 3 peer-reviewed references from within last five years with at least 2 articles from nursing.
Developing 11 (11%) – 12 (12%)
Uses some credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the assignment. Generally uses information in ways that are true to original context. Mostly distinguishes between own ideas or common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution. Must include 3 peer-reviewed references.
Begining 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Uses source in an attempt to support ideas in the assignment, but source is not credible or relevant. Generally uses information in ways that are true to original context. Mostly distinguishes between own ideas or common knowledge and ideas requiring attribution. Must include at least 1 reference.
Incomplete 0 (0%) – 9 (9%)
Does not meet minimal standards or does not submit work.
Organization, Writing Style, Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, and Formatting

(15% of Grade)–
Levels of Achievement:
Exemplary 15 (15%) – 15 (15%)
Uses clear structure as outlined in the assignment with all components present. Uses graceful, clear, concise, error-free language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers. Fully conforms to APA formatting standards.
Mastery 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Uses clear structure as outlined in the assignment with all components present. Uses straightforward, clear, concise, nearly error-free language that conveys meaning to readers. Conforms to APA formatting standards, with only minor deviations.
Developing 11 (11%) – 12 (12%)
Mainly uses structure as outlined in the assignment with most components present. Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers, although writing may include some errors or may not be concise. Mostly conforms to APA formatting standards.
Begining 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Uses structure that is not clear or does not match expectations of assignment. Uses language that attempts to convey meaning for readers, but writing includes significant errors or is not clear. Somewhat conforms to APA formatting standards.
Incomplete 0 (0%) – 9 (9%)
Does not meet minimal standards or does not submit work.
Name:M6A1_Integrated Health Promotion Plan Graded Assignment Rubric
Description:The following criteria will be used to grade your individual assignment, which accounts for 25% of your final grade. Keep in mind that the expectations described under each performance level on the scale (e.g., master, developing) defines the minimum performance that must be demonstrated. Fewer points will be awarded if the expectations of each criterion are not met or only partially met. Mastery is considered “target” performance. Performance at a Mastery level for each criterion is considered ideal. Exemplary performance is considered rare.
Performance levels equate to the following point ranges on a 100-point scale:
Exemplary = 100 – 95
Mastery = 94 – 85
Developing = 84 – 75
Beginning = 74 – 65
Incomplete = 64 – 0
Point ranges are equivalent to the following letter grades: 100 – 90 points = A
89 – 80 points = B
79 – 70 points = C
69 – 60 points = D
Below 60 = F