1. How many participants were in the study, and what was the rationale for choosing participant grade-level selections?
2- Who were the research study participants, and from where were they recruited?
3-What does it mean for a sample to have “over” or “under” representation in some area?
4-. How was the data collected? What was the significance of the italicized language in the questions?
5-How was the data coded and quantified?
6-What were the research findings in terms of statistical significance of the chi-square values, and in terms of everyday language?
7-How do the findings challenge our current understandings about career aspirations and sex-role expectations?
8-What are the implications for counselors and educators in elementary and middle schools?
9- From your perspective, what are the overall strengths and weaknesses of the article in terms of threats to validity?
10- What is your overall impression of the article.








Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson



