‘m taking an environmental philosphy class and do not have time to finish this argumentative essay. I hope that someone can help me with this even without having the book.

My take on this is that I don’t want to make a animals suffer. Before, my mother had cancer and I looked up here medicine and saw that it was tested on animals which made me very confused on how I really felt. Nowadays I know that with the right diet we can actually cure cancer(yes, look on YouTube) with a good clean diet. So I’ve been swaying back and forth. I still think that animal testing is wrong.
I’m the kind of person that save the life of any small creature that I can. Animal lover, for sure. It would of course be nice if the essay writer do have an understanding in that I am a vegetarian, I don’t like zoos, don’t use animal tested products.

Since this is might be hard for anyone to write I give you who write it all three questions my professor gave me so that you can pick what seems to be the easiest to write with the information that is provided. Thank you so much.

Argumentative Essay #2

The essay should be 2-3 pages (single spaced, typewritten). You can print your paper on the back side of already used paper, or print doubled sided, if at all possible.

What are your animal ethics?

Answer the above question as part of your discussion in answering one of the following questions.

1) Is suffering the most important thing to avoid in our treatment of animals?  What other considerations might be important?  Is it wrong to painlessly kill animals?  Why or why not?

2) Individualism vs. Holism Can the interests of individual animals be sacrificed in order to protect ecosystems or preserve species?  If so, are there limits on the extent of the sacrifice?  If so, what are these limits?

3) Choose one of the following practices in which animals are used by humans and discuss whether or not it is morally permissible.  Why or why not?

?Pets
?Zoos or Aquariums
?Experimentation
?Food or Clothing
?Hunting or Fishing for sport

You should show an understanding of both the position you are arguing for and also the one you are rejecting.

This paper should be a philosophy paper in which you focus on normative, evaluative, or conceptual issues.  Be sure to take a position based on your evaluation.

Support your position by discussing the concepts as discussed by one of the authors Reflecting on Nature or Jamieson Ethics and the Environment, along with illustration from one of the assigned films or your own experiences in your own life.

A few of the authors from Reflecting on nature is Aldo Leopold, John Muir, j. b Calicott, Peter singer, James lovelock, aristotle, the other book, Ethics and the environment, an introduction can be found as a preview in google books.