ENG315: Week5: Assignment 2.2 Justification Report Part 2

Assignment 2.2: Justification Report – Part 2

Each paper builds on the last, 3 more papers to follow.

Due Week 5 and worth 150 points

In Part 1 of your Justification Report assignment, you built up the following sections: Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods. In Part 2, you will revise Part 1 based on your instructor’s suggestions and add to it the following sections: Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References.

Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:

Evaluation of Alternatives (for Questions 1-3)
Findings and Analysis (for Questions 4-5)
References (for Question 6)

Using the provided template, write Part 2 of a single-spaced report in which you:

1. Include and revise the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.

2. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you’ve identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.

a. Example: You might research other organizations that have attempted similar solutions to the problem you have identified and explore the results of those experiments.

3. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.

a. Example: If your research revealed that four (4) companies similar to yours increased productivity after allowing their workers to telework from home three days per week, you might conclude that one of your suggested alternatives – in this case, the option to telework from home three days per week – satisfies one of your criterion of “Productivity” as a high-potential solution to a problem you’ve identified (of decreased worker morale and productivity at Doe’s Electronics). However, additional research might frustrate a recommendation of this alternative if it is found to fall short of other criteria while a second alternative fares better. For instance, a telework alternative might be found to be too costly to implement; too frustrating for consumers who prefer daily, in-person customer service; or too divergent from the company’s brand, “Always there for you!”

4. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.

a. Example: An abbreviated outline of what this longer section might look like based on the above example is below (Note: Only the first two [2] of five [5] required criteria are included to give you a feel for the structure). Your researched findings, represented as circled bullets below, should be explained in two to five (2-5) sentences. Include in-text citations and follow up with References in APA style):

Evaluation of Alternatives

o Productivity

§ Alternative A: Telework from home three (3) days per week

o {narrate findings based on research article 1 here}

§ Alternative B: Offer two (2) extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year

o {narrate findings based on research article 2 here}

o Cost

§ Alternative A: Telework from home three (3) days per week

o {narrate findings based on research article 1 here}

§ Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year

o {narrate findings based on research article 2 here}

5. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.

6. Include a chart like the ones below to illustrate at a glance:

Figure 1: Alternatives Analyzed by Criteria

*Criteria*	*Telework Option*	*Floating Holiday Option*
Productivity	Very high	Negligible increase
Cost	Very high	Moderate
Company Image	Increased	Negligible increase
Worker Morale	Increased	Negligible increase
Practicality	Moderate	Low
*TOTAL Feasibility of Alternatives based on Criteria?**	Moderate to High	Low to Moderate

7.
*Feasability = Capability of an alternative being carried out with success

8. Include an APA style (6th edition) References page that documents the two (2) sources (minimum) that you used and cited in-text in your Evaluation of Alternatives section. You may use secondary resources, or you may include one primary source and one secondary source. Remember that both in-text citations and References must be included (to avoid plagiarism) whenever you are directly quoting, summarizing, or paraphrasing researched material.

Your assignment must:

Be typed, single spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professorâ€™s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Support ideas or claims in body paragraphs with clear details, examples, and explanations.
Organize ideas logically by using transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
Use sentence variety and effective word choice in written communication.
Apply writing process strategies to develop formal business reports and / or proposals.
Use technology and information resources to research issues related to selected topics.
Write clearly and concisely using proper writing mechanics.

Consider the feedback from your professor and / or online tutor when making your revisions.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150	Assignment 2.2: Justification Report – Part 2
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Include and revise the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Insufficiently included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Partially included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Satisfactorily included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.	Thoroughly included and revised the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.
2. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Did not submit or incompletely recorded bibliographic information during research.	Insufficiently researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Insufficiently recorded bibliographic information during research.	Partially researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Partially recorded bibliographic information during research.	Satisfactorily researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Satisfactorily recorded bibliographic information during research.	Thoroughly researched the two (2) alternatives (i.e., possible solutions) identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Thoroughly recorded bibliographic information during research.
3. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Insufficiently used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Partially used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Satisfactorily used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.	Thoroughly used what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.
4. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely organized the assignment by your criteria. Did not submit or incompletely explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Did not submit or incompletely explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Insufficiently organized the assignment by your criteria. Insufficiently explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Insufficiently explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Partially organized the assignment by your criteria. Partially explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Partially explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Satisfactorily organized the assignment by your criteria. Satisfactorily explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Satisfactorily explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.	Thoroughly organized the assignment by your criteria. Thoroughly explained in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Thoroughly explained how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.
5. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.	Insufficiently summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.	Partially summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.	Satisfactorily summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternativessection.	Thoroughly summarized in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from theEvaluation of Alternativessection.
6. Include a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Insufficiently Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Partially Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Satisfactorily Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.	Thoroughly Included a relevant chart representing the feasibility of each alternative.
7. Two (2) References provided. Weight: 5%	No references provided.	Insufficiently included the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Partially included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Satisfactorily included the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Thoroughly included required number of references; all references high quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 20%	More than 8 errors present.	7-8 errors present.	5-6 errors present.	3-4 errors present.	0-2 errors present.