Develop test plan, training plan, and maintenance methodology for SanGrafix, a video game design company. Each test and maintenance methodology should include a method for testing applications, operating systems, network connectivity, speed, load testing, interoperability, permissions, and security. Please research and come up with a comprehensive plan. The following files have been supplied for your use:Guide to Test, Training, and Exercise Programs for IT Plans and Capabilities (SP800-84)Attached Files: SP800-84.pdf (453.774 KB)Rubric Detail A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.ContentName: Case Study and Structured Assignment RubricDescription: This rubric will be used for case studies and assignments. UnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodExcellentAnalysisPoints Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)Does not present an analysis of the issues identified or demonstrate an understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified and demonstrates a somewhat acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s).EvaluationPoints Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)Makes no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading. Does not Support diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective.Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument.Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; Demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied. Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective.RecommendationsPoints Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)Does not present realistic or appropriate recommendations and offers no support from the information presented and concepts from the reading.Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading.Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Presents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading.Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading.ResearchPoints Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)Does not supplement case study with research and documentation.Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Supplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consulted.Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Supplements case study with relevant research into the present situation of the company; documents all sources of information.Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)Supplements case study with relevant and extensive research into the present situation of the company; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information.Writing MechanicsPoints Range:0 (0%) – 14 (14%)Writing is extremely unfocused, rambling, or contains major errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; extremely disorganized. Does not use APA guidelines.Points Range:15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines.Points Range:17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized. Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources.Points Range:19 (19%) – 20 (20%)Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized. Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources.Name:Case Study and Structured Assignment RubricDescription:This rubric will be used for case studies and assignments.FOLLOW ALL THE ABOVE STEPS AS MENTIONEDAPA FORMATNO PLAGIARISMFOLLOW THE ATTACHED FILE RUBRIC FOR PAPER REFERENCE