Describe the concept of empowerment and discuss whether or not it is a universally effective leadership method.
BS302/562 Leadership Theory and Practice: Major Essay
Choose any one of the topics below and write an essay of approximately 2000 words in response. Your essay should be thoroughly researched and referenced and, where appropriate, use
examples from actual organisations.
1. Describe the concept of empowerment and discuss whether or not it is a universally effective leadership method.
2. Discuss the challenges facing the leaders of virtual teams. To what extent can mainstream team leadership methods be used in a virtual environment?
3. Research an organisation that is known for its creativity and innovation and identify the strategic leadership practices that enable these qualities. How closely do these practices
reflect strategic leadership theory?
4. Identify an existing leadership development program and critique it against the principles and practices outlined in the literature. What are its strengths and weaknesses? How
effective would it be? (NB If you choose this topic, please submit a copy of the program outline/prospectus as an attachment)
5. Critique the concept of worldly leadership. Is it a realistic approach to leadership in all types of organisations and contexts, or is it more suited to some than others?
Marking Criteria
Criteria Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
Understanding of concepts and theories No understanding of leadership concepts and theories
Limited understanding of leadership concepts and theories Sound understanding of leadership concepts and theories High level of understanding of leadership concepts
and theories Deep understanding of leadership concepts and theories
Critical thought No evidence of critical thought; ideas simply rehashed from texts
Evidence of limited critical thought; mostly reliant on ideas from texts. Good level of critical thought and analysis without extending the concepts. High level of critical
thought with some evidence of original thinking Exceptionally high level of analysis and synthesis with original thinking.
Writing Poor written expression; frequent spelling errors/typos
Reasonable written expression; regular spelling errors/typos Writes coherently; occasional spelling errors/typos Writes clearly and fluently; correct spelling, a minor typo or
two Writes articulately and engagingly; no spelling errors or typos
Research/
Referencing Little or no research evident; fails to acknowledge sources Minimal research evident; relies on non-academic sources; referencing incorrect or incomplete
Reasonable level of research evident; academic and non-academic sources cited; referencing mostly correct Substantial research from academic sources evident; correct referencing
throughout Extensive research from academic sources evident; correct referencing throughout








Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson



