Critically evaluate the view that Taylorism and Fordism have been replaced by Post-Fordism as the ruling paradigm of work and employments in capitalist societiesStructure:Introduction (120-165)? Definitions? Taylorism, fordism, post-fordism? Aims of the essay. Use the words from the question and be specific? Background? Something interesting; quate, news, story, good exampleMain body? Taylorism? What is Taylorism/Scientific management?? Do his principles still exist/are they still relevant? Fordism? What is fordism? (Use some key terms from PPT)? Was he really influenced by Taylor (G2 PPT/Edgell)? Does it still exist?? What is the situation now?? Post-fordism (positive about JLP)? What is post-fordism? Key features of PFSabel& Piore—“Third Italy” “Flexible Specialisation”JLP—The post-fordist interpretation :)(Edgell)Atkinson—‘Flexible Firm’Examples of Post-fordism—articles, news etc.Critics of post-fordism/Flexibility (disadvantages)? Pollert? Wood? Bradley(H)? Neo-fordism (or the Neo-fordist interpretation of JLP) (negative )? Key features of Neo-Fordism?? Ohno/Cusumano—Pioneers of JLP ‘leant it all from Ford’s book’(107-114) Edgell? McDonaldisation—what is it, key features (H, W, E)Conclusion(120-165)? Start with ‘in conclusion…’? Make your thoughts clear, tell me what you think!? Use the words from the question? Give your view then summarize why you have this view? If you have time/space criticize the other side