Fill in Order Details

  • Submit paper details for free using our simple order form

Make Payment Securely

  • Add funds to your account. There are no upfront payments. The writer will only be paid once you have approved your paper

Writing Process

  • The best qualified expert writer is assigned to work on your order
  • Your paper is written to standard and delivered as per your instructions

Download your paper

  • Download the completed paper from your online account or your email
  • You can request a plagiarism and quality report along with your paper
Posted on by admin

conduct a virtual site inspection though a website of a venue and evaluate a potential site for a meeting with 100 people at an international hotel or an event site the meetings will be held for two days create all the details for this meeting that

Option #2: Virtual Site Inspection

Conduct a virtual site inspection (though a website of a venue) and evaluate a potential site for a meeting with 100 people at an international hotel or an event site. The meetings will be held for two days. Create all the details for this meeting that would include:

  • A discussion on the nature of the meeting
  • The scope of what the meeting planner needs to complete
  • Details for breakout rooms
  • Determine all meals
  • Explain crowd management strategies
  • The fiscal requirements.

Your paper should be three to four pages in length (excluding cover page and at least three supporting references) and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Be sure to discuss and reference concepts taken from the assigned textbook reading and relevant research. You must include a minimum of three credible, academic or professional references. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Be sure to check out the Hospitality Tourism Management guide in the CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.). Here you can:

  • Locate a variety of information sources that deal with hospitality, tourism, and management.
  • Gather industry information specific to different aspects of hospitality or tourism.
  • Locate writing and citing help.

Grading rubric below:

Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.
remove empty attachment

remove empty attachment
Submitting…

Before you can submit assignments directly from Google Drive you need to authorize Canvas to access your Google Drive account: Authorize Google Drive Access

Rubric

true

309993

Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.

Find a Rubric

Find Rubric

HTM320 Mod 5 CT

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

HTM320 Mod 5 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements _8862

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_2824

Edit ratingDelete rating

12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_5480

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_8654

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

_4829

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 15.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent _2370

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials, including an understanding of the site inspection process and components.

_3336

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in understanding the site inspection process and components.

_504

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in understanding the site inspection process and components.

_3819

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate an understanding of the site inspection process and components.

_2708

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 25.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis _6722

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications, including an understanding of the site inspection process, the nature of the meeting, the meeting planner’s scope of responsibilities, and the fiscal requirements.

_6598

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications related to the site inspection process, the nature of the meeting, the meeting planner’s scope of responsibilities, and the fiscal requirements.

_7470

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications related to the site inspection process, the nature of the meeting, the meeting planner’s scope of responsibilities, and the fiscal requirements.

_688

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications related to the site inspection process, the nature of the meeting, the meeting planner’s scope of responsibilities, and the fiscal requirements.

_1138

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 25.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. _6191

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

_885

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

_1057

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

_9690

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

_9052

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 10.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style _6606

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

_6137

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

_6438

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

_3804

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

_7529

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 10.0 pts

—

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

<

ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER AND DELEGATE FULFILMENT OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT TO EXPERT ACADEMIC WRITERS. PLAGIARISM-FREE, GUARANTEED A, TIMELY DELIVERY.

strategic planning visioning session

WHAT OUR CURRENT CUSTOMERS SAY

  • Google Rating
  • Sitejabber
  • Trustpilot
Zahraa S
Zahraa S
Absolutely spot on. I have had the best experience with Elite Academic Research and all my work have scored highly. Thank you for your professionalism and using expert writers with vast and outstanding knowledge in their fields. I highly recommend any day and time.
Stuart L
Stuart L
Thanks for keeping me sane for getting everything out of the way, I’ve been stuck working more than full time and balancing the rest but I’m glad you’ve been ensuring my school work is taken care of. I'll recommend Elite Academic Research to anyone who seeks quality academic help, thank you so much!
Mindi D
Mindi D
Brilliant writers and awesome support team. You can tell by the depth of research and the quality of work delivered that the writers care deeply about delivering that perfect grade.
Samuel Y
Samuel Y
I really appreciate the work all your amazing writers do to ensure that my papers are always delivered on time and always of the highest quality. I was at a crossroads last semester and I almost dropped out of school because of the many issues that were bombarding but I am glad a friend referred me to you guys. You came up big for me and continue to do so. I just wish I knew about your services earlier.
Cindy L
Cindy L
You can't fault the paper quality and speed of delivery. I have been using these guys for the past 3 years and I not even once have they ever failed me. They deliver properly researched papers way ahead of time. Each time I think I have had the best their professional writers surprise me with even better quality work. Elite Academic Research is a true Gem among essay writing companies.
Got an A and plagiarism percent was less than 10%! Thanks!
prevnext

ORDER NOW

Consider Your Assignments Done

“All my friends and I are getting help from eliteacademicresearch. It’s every college student’s best kept secret!”

Jermaine Byrant
BSN

“I was apprehensive at first. But I must say it was a great experience and well worth the price. I got an A!”

Nicole Johnson
Finance & Economics

ORDER NOW

Our Top Experts

————-

See Why Our Clients Hire Us Again And Again!


OVER
10.3k
Reviews

RATING
4.89/5
Avg Rating

YEARS
12
Experience

Elite Academic Research Promises You:


Always on Time

If we are a minute late, the work is on us – it’s free!

Plagiarism-free

If the work we produce contains plagiarism we’ll pay out a £5,000 guarantee.

Quality

Providing quality work is core to our beliefs, which is why we will strive to give you exactly that, and more!

Written to Standard

All of our assignments go through a stringent quality checking process from start to finish.

ORDER NOW

Success Guarantee

When you order form the best, some of your greatest problems as a student are solved!

Reliable

Professional

Affordable

Quick

See our Results

ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT NOW

Using this writing service is legal and is not prohibited by any law, university or college policies. Services of Elite Academic Research are provided for research and study purposes only with the intent to help students improve their writing and academic experience. We do not condone or encourage cheating, academic dishonesty, or any form of plagiarism. Our original, plagiarism-free, zero-AI expert samples should only be used as references. It is your responsibility to cite any outside sources appropriately. This service will be useful for students looking for quick, reliable, and efficient online class-help on a variety of topics.