Topic: Case Study AnalysisOrder DescriptionUsing the following sitehttp://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/criminal/larceny.html identify the proofs of larceny(Theft). NSW Crimes Act 40/1900 117 (Case Study “Its not yours until you pay” on Larceny). Are these proofs able to be satisfied in the issues that arise in the case study. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/society-and-culture/its-not-yours-until-you-pay-20100121-mo66.htmlUsing the case study, explain how police must apply LEPRA (Law Enforcement Power and Responsibility act 2002) if they intend to question, search, or arrest or caution a suspectIdentify the alternatives that are available to police when dealing with the issues in this case study. Arrest or Caution or Summons or Court Attendance Notice or Unofficial Caution. Remember this assessment is not an integrity test its about the most appropriate way to deal with the issues of alleged theft that arise in the case study. You choose how you want to deal with the matter and use the appropriate LEPRA and rule of law criteriaReflect on the police action and present any alternatives to arresting and chargingQuotes and sources must be referenced appropriately.