ApplicationReadthis account of a criminal investigation and evaluate its effectiveness:In a California city, two janitors showing up for work were met at thedoor of the restaurant they were to clean by two armed men. One janitor wastaken in- side; the other escaped and notified the police. When the policearrived, both suspects were outside the building in different areas and claimedthey knew nothing of a crime being committed. Inside, the one janitor was tiedup in the kitchen, unharmed. The safe had been punched open. A substancebelieved to be safe insulation, along with paint chips, was found in thetrouser cuffs and shoes of both suspects. Both janitors made a positive fieldidentification of the two suspects. Laboratory analysis of the substance foundin the suspects’ clothing and shoes matched a com- parison sample of the safeinsulation, and the paint chips matched the top two layers of paint on thesafe. The men were charged with burglary.Questions1. Was it legal to take the men into custody?2. Was field identification appropriate?3. Was it legal to submit the safe insulationand paint chips for laboratory analysis?4. Was the charge correct? 5. What additional evidence should have beenlocated and seized?