Details:

 

Write a Research Proposal (1,000-1,500 words) on a topic relevant to the course. To complete the Research Proposal, do the following:

 

Review the Topic 7 lecture section on The Results and Discussion Sections in the Research Proposal for a brief overview pertaining to “how to” complete the assignment.

 Introductory section: Include hypothesis and a review of the literature. Methodology section: Include subsections on Participants, Apparatus/Materials/Instruments, Procedure, and Design. Results section: Include statistic, critical values, degrees of freedom, and alpha level. Discussion section: Include interpretation of results, ethical concerns, limitations of study, and suggestions for future research. Appendices section: Include a minimum of two appendices (either two figures, two tables, or a figure and a table).

 

6.    Include at least six to eight scholarly references

 

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

 

 

Reference

 

Jackson, S. L. (2015).  Research Methods A Modular Approach (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/cengage/2014/research-methods_a-modular-approach_ebook_3e.php

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Soon you have to turn in a research proposal. The proposal has to be 1,000-1,500 words on a topic relevant to the course. A COMPLETE proposal will have the following:

 

 

 

1. Introductory section- this section will have the purpose, objective, hypothesis and specific aims of your research (how you plan to test your hypothesis). You also need to include a review of the literature. Some tips with writing a strong introduction is to always adhere to the instructions in regards to what the section should be composed of. This section is used to set-up your proposal/introduce your reader to the topic and field you are working with. Since your proposed experiment should be aiding to fill some scientific gap, it is your job to use the literature to tie in what the problem is, what has previously and currently been done to address the problem and how your proposal will add to the body of literature on your topic. Do to word limits; this section should be concise but detailed. When writing proposals fluff and fillers are not helpful. Get right to the point!

 

 

 

2. Methodology section- this section should cover HOW you plan to carry out your experiment/test your hypothesis. You should include subsections with descriptions on the number of participants used in your study, what statistics you will use,any apparatus/materials/instruments you will use, and your procedure/experimental design ie how you plan to physically carry out your experiment.

 

 

 

3. Results section- this section is where you STATE WHAT YOU FOUND. Include statistics, critical values, degrees of freedom, and alpha level.

 

 

 

4. Discussion section- this sections is where you DISCUSS WHAT YOU FOUND. Include interpretation of results, ethical concerns, limitations of study, and suggestions for future research. Use this section to tie your hypothesis, experimental design, and results all together. What do your numbers mean? What are your conclusions? You should also include a sentence of two regarding the future direction of your research. Make sure you show how your research ties into a bigger picture to add value to your chosen scientific area.

 

 

 

5. Appendices section: Include a minimum of two appendices (either two figures, two tables, or a figure and a table).

 

 

 

6. Include a minimum of two scholarly references

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I cannot stress enough how important it is to have all of the components listed. It not only makes for a strong proposal but it aids in understanding/ visualizing the complete picture. To gain maximum points, you should have all the listed components as well as adhere to the word limit. Scientific reading is about being concise and accurate! Please see the attached example (from

 

 

 

http://www.bcps.org/offices/lis/researchcourse/develop_write_sample.html) for additional help. The example is not the only way to complete the assignment but just an EXAMPLE (it is also longer than yours). Also, the proposal should be justified and written in formal standard English and not in first person. 

 

 

 

Rubric

 

Research Proposal: Project Paper

 

 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

 

40.0 % Research Proposal Write a research proposal on a topic relevant to the course

Proposal is irrelevant; it fails to include or includes only two of the following elements: an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, appendix, and scholarly resources.

Proposal is somewhat relevant, but is underdeveloped and inadequate and includes only three of the following elements: an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, appendix, and scholarly resources.

Proposal is relevant, adequate, and includes four of the following elements: an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, appendix, and scholarly resources.

Proposal is relevant, proficient, and includes five of the following elements: an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, appendix, and scholarly resources.

Proposal is relevant, comprehensive, and includes all six of the following elements: an introduction, methodology, results, discussion, appendix, and scholarly resources.  

70.0 %Content

 

30.0 % Content Comprehension

Content is incomplete and omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are irrelevant to the assignment. No outside sources were used to support major points.

Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Major points are not clear or persuasive. No outside sources were used to support major points.

Content is not comprehensive or persuasive. Major points are addressed but are not well-supported by outside sources. Research is inadequate in either relevance, quality of outside sources, or currentness. Irrelevant academic sources were cited.

Content is comprehensive and accurate; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are supported. Research is adequate, current, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment?s criteria. At least one relevant academic source was cited.

Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated. Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. Research is adequate, current, relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment?s criteria. Two or more relevant academic sources were cited.  

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.  

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.  

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.  

10.0 %Format

 

5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.  

5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.  

100 % Total Weightage