Assignment 2: Challenger Space Shuttle Disaster Analysis
For this assignment, you will apply the concepts of the four-frame approach to management decisions and write a report.
Background Overview:
In many professions, leaders have to confront very complex challenges and the results can fall well below everyone’s expectations. The disasters with the Challenger and the Columbia Space Shuttles portray situations where bad decision making led to disasters that changed the history of space exploration. In your professional life, you may be subjected to many complex problems. A critical assessment of the four frames can make the difference between success and failure.
To prepare for this assignment, read the following article (and any other ones related to these accidents) in order to construct the “big picture” that will allow you to conduct your analysis:
- Dettmer, H. W. (2008). Conflict and Complexity. Quality Progress, 41(1), 22-29
Directions:
- Identify the frame(s) used by the leaders in the Challenger and Columbia situations (i.e., Structure, HR, Political, and Symbolic).
- Review the choice of frames made by the management in those situations. Explain if the situation with the space shuttles occurred due to management choosing the wrong frame, an incorrect application of a given frame, or for other reasons.
- If you were the person in charge of the Challenger and Columbia, recommend what other frame(s) you would have considered in the decision-making process. For your recommendations, take into account the constraints faced at the time of the events. Justify your answer using the characteristics of each frame from your readings.
- Based on your recommendation made in the previous question, explain how you would address the Challenger and Columbia situations using a different frame or a combination of them.
Write a 2–3-page report in Word format. Utilize at least two scholarly sources in your research. Your paper should be written in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M6_A2.doc. For example, if your name is John Smith, your document will be named SmithJ_M6_A2.doc.
By Wednesday, October 19, 2016, deliver your assignment to the M6: Assignment 2 Dropbox.
Grading Criteria
| Grading Criteria |
Proficient
|
Maximum Points
|
|
Identify the frame(s) used by the leaders in the Challenger and Columbia situations (i.e., Structural, HR, Political, and Symbolic). |
Identification of the frame(s) used by the leaders in the Challenger and Columbia situations are clear and accurate. Scholarly resources are utilized in support. |
12
|
|
Review and discuss the choice of frames made by the management in the case of those situations. |
An accurate review is provided regarding the choice of frames made by the management in the case situations. A correct explanation of whether the situation with the Challenger and Columbia happened due to management choosing the wrong frame or due to another reason is also given. |
12
|
|
Recommend what other frame(s) should have been considered in the decision-making process. Justify your answer using the characteristics of each frame from your readings. |
A logical recommendation of what other frames should have been considered for both the Challenger and Columbia situations is provided. The constraints faced at the time of the events were considered. Scholarly resources are utilized in support. |
12
|
|
Based on your recommendation made in the previous question, explain how you would address the Challenger and Columbia situations using a different frame or a combination of them. |
An appropriate determination and explanation of how you would address the Challenger and Columbia situations using a different frame or a combination of them is given. Scholarly resources are utilized in support. |
16
|
| Writing Standards | ||
|
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources (i.e., APA); and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. |
8
|
| Total: |
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
