In the previous activity, you viewed the PBS film “The Real CSI” and answered questions related to its content. Now, please read the following short article that followed the film shortly after it aired and a response that followed:

• Bartos, L. (2014, April 11). Shake-Up Inside Forensic Credentialing Organization (Links to an external site.). Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/real-csi/shake-up-inside-forensic-credentialing-organization/
• Roberts, J. (n.d.). ACFEI’S official statement in response to Frontline’s film and ProPublica’s article (Links to an external site.). Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws.com/propublica/assets/docs/ACFEI.ProPublicaOfficialStmt.pdf

After viewing the film, reading the PBS article and response that followed, discuss the following:

• Take a stance on which party is credible, and which party is not.
• Give pros and cons for your position, supporting each pro and con with material presented to-date in this course.

• In 250 word post your initial considerations on this topic by no later than the fourth night of the module week, so that your classmates have a good chance to read and reply before the end of the week.
• You should come back into the discussion forum several times throughout the week, and respond to at least two posts from other students.
• Please offer your views and insights, reviewing and commenting on the same as posted by the other students, comparing and contrasting the various answers and also contributing alternative points of view and ideas.
• Remember to cite the above sources in APA format