Points: 320

Assignment 3: Vice President of Operations, Part 3

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Determine which statistical technique you will employ to measure the quality characteristics of your organization. Provide examples to support the rationale.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely determined which statistical technique you will employ to measure the quality characteristics of your organization; did not submit or incompletely provided examples to support your rationale.

Partially determined which statistical technique you will employ to measure the quality characteristics of your organization; partially provided examples to support your rationale.

Satisfactorily determined which statistical technique you will employ to measure the quality characteristics of your organization; satisfactorily provided examples to support your rationale.

Thoroughly determined which statistical technique you will employ to measure the quality characteristics of your organization; thoroughly provided examples to support your rationale.

2. Analyze the current facility location, and then use the three-step procedure to determine a new location.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the current facility location, and then did not submit or incompletely used the three-step procedure to determine a new location.

Partially analyzed the current facility location, and then partially used the three-step procedure to determine a new location.

Satisfactorily analyzed the current facility location, and then satisfactorily used the three-step procedure to determine a new location.

Thoroughly analyzed the current facility location, and then thoroughly used the three-step procedure to determine a new location.

3. Analyze the key concepts related to capacity planning and facility location for the new location.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key concepts related to capacity planning and facility location for the new location.

Partially analyzed the key concepts related to capacity planning and facility location for the new location.

Satisfactorily analyzed the key concepts related to capacity planning and facility location for the new location.

Thoroughly analyzed the key concepts related to capacity planning and facility location for the new location.

4. Examine the current work system design, and determine your organization’s selected feasibility in the job design (i.e., technical, economic, behavioral). Assess key elements of the rationale in the work design competitive advantage.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the current work system design, and did not submit or incompletely determined your organization’s selected feasibility in the job design (i.e., technical, economic, behavioral), and did not submit or incompletely assessed key elements of the rationale in the work design competitive advantage.

Partially examined the current work system design, and partially determined your organization’s selected feasibility in the job design (i.e., technical, economic, behavioral), and partially assessed key elements of the rationale in the work design competitive advantage.

Satisfactorily examined the current work system design, and satisfactorily determined your organization’s selected feasibility in the job design (i.e., technical, economic, behavioral), and satisfactorily assessed key elements of the rationale in the work design competitive advantage.

Thoroughly examined the current work system design, and thoroughly determined your organization’s selected feasibility in the job design (i.e., technical, economic, behavioral), and thoroughly assessed key elements of the rationale in the work design competitive advantage.

5. Using the method analysis described in the textbook, defend the new change implementation process and the rationale for the change of method.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely used the method analysis described in the textbook; did not submit or incompletely defended the new change implementation process and the rationale for the change of method.

Partially used the method analysis described in the textbook; partially defended the new change implementation process and the rationale for the change of method.

Satisfactorily used the method analysis described in the textbook; satisfactorily defended the new change implementation process and the rationale for the change of method.

Thoroughly used the method analysis described in the textbook; thoroughly defended the new change implementation process and the rationale for the change of method.

6. Develop a diagram showing network planning techniques using the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and the critical path method (CPM).

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely developed a diagram showing network planning techniques using the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and the critical path method (CPM).

Partially developed a diagram showing network planning techniques using the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and the critical path method (CPM).

Satisfactorily developed a diagram showing network planning techniques using the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and the critical path method (CPM).

Thoroughly developed a diagram showing network planning techniques using the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and the critical path method (CPM).

7. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%