“The Sovereignty of Parliament is not a phenomenon that derives from a legal source, and as such neither is it a phenomenon that can be altered by a legal source. The ultimate fact is that

Parliament’s sovereign cannot be restricted.’&apos

Project description
!!!!! CONTINUE OF THE QUESTION: … Ian Loveland, Constitutional Law, Administrative law and Human Rights, 4th edition (Pearson Longman, 2006), p.219. Critically evaluate this statement with

reference to doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy and the European Communities Act 1972

STRUCTURE :
-Introduction(short background)
-Body Paragraph (analysis, arguments, advantages/disadvantages, examples)
-Conclusion (whole analysis)

Its very IMPORTANT that this essay has ielts style NO MORE THAN 5.0-5.5!!! Do not write it professional. Use simple difinition and words as much as possible. Avoid difficult words

Its allowed to use just 3 sources: GCSE LAW 5th edition, examples of case just in WEST LAW, and also bbc/guardian
This essay should have JUST THIS SOURCES (if there will be another source-it will send back as to change)

And other important thing, to write this essay according to the OXFORD REFERENCING CONVENTION!!!!!!
Again, if essay will be not written according to this instruction, it will send to change