did put one page, when I find an expert, he/she can tell me how many pages need to add.

I got comments from my examiners in my viva. I have done 8 of them and still six.

I need you to review the 8 points I have done then do the six I didn’t which are below:

1. why it is useful to use UTAUT (in Introduction and Methodology)
2. what UTAUT-related hypotheses you can construct? e.g. age correlates with PEOU, PEOU correlates with intention to use and so on (in Introduction and Methodology)
3. how UTAUT informed the questionnaire design (in Methodology)
4. how you analysed the data to reveal the relationships between the UTAUT constructs (in Analysis)
5. why the new constructs you introduced are needed (how do you prove this?) (in Analysis and Results)
6. what you have proved with regard to UTAUT in other words does the model work for this case? i.e. does the data you have gathered tell the same story as other UTAUT studies? Does it work better when you introduce new constructs? (in Results and Conclusions) This needs to be your contribution to knowledge, not just running the questionnaire in Saudi Arabia.

points 4, 5 and 6 you really need someone who can help with the statistics. This also needs to relay on a close reading of other UTAUT studies, particularly their analysis sections. This one is a good example – http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/3/4/2158244013503837.full-text.pdf+html

The 8 points I have done and I need you to review them if they still need more work:

Based on discussed at the viva, the candidate needs to re-work extensively the thesis along the following key points:

1.The Research questions need to be more explicit and lead to a more deep investigation of the issues associated with the adoption and acceptance of mHealth. Specific dimensions of this analysis need to be made explicit (usability, technology and architecture issues, models and techniques)
2.The literature survey needs to strengthen references to current research in acceptance and usability of mHealth, current technological state-of-the-art and issues associated.
3.The research methods used need to be discussed and contrasted to other approaches and critically evaluated.
4.The approach to mHealth that is investigated needs to be made more clear, both in terms of the model and modes of interaction between patients and stakeholders, usability, technological options, architectures and limitations relevant to Diabetes and the KSA as well as other contexts relevant to the acceptance of such systems. More specific reference/analysis using either a real prototype of such an application, and/or existing (similar) applications needs to be made and evaluated.
5.The thesis should show the alignment of the results with either the research questions, hypotheses, or the UTAUT model (or both) through a table or other visual representation.

check the file attached.