Fill in Order Details

  • Submit paper details for free using our simple order form

Make Payment Securely

  • Add funds to your account. There are no upfront payments. The writer will only be paid once you have approved your paper

Writing Process

  • The best qualified expert writer is assigned to work on your order
  • Your paper is written to standard and delivered as per your instructions

Download your paper

  • Download the completed paper from your online account or your email
  • You can request a plagiarism and quality report along with your paper
Posted on by admin

module 10 written assignment concept map 2

Your patient is a 52-year-old male with a history of smoking and alcohol abuse. He presents to the ED with complaints of “my skin looks yellow, my stomach hurts, and I feel nauseous”. He is taken to CT and a tumor near the pancreas is observed. It appears to be blocking the common bile duct. Develop a plan of care for the patient. Use the attached concept map.

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: Concept map: GI

Novice Competent Proficient
ORGANIZATION Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

CONTENT & MECHANICS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations

Feedback:

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Subjective & objective data not included

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Subjective & objective data partially included

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Subjective & objective data included

Feedback:

NURSING DIAGNOSIS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

NURSING INTERVENTIONS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

GOALS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

ORGANIZATION—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected

1 (14.28571%) points

Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

CONTENT & MECHANICS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

1 (14.28571%) points

Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations

Feedback:

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

1 (14.28571%) points

Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Subjective & objective data not included

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Subjective & objective data partially included

1 (14.28571%) points

Subjective & objective data included

Feedback:

NURSING DIAGNOSIS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

1 (14.28571%) points

Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

NURSING INTERVENTIONS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

1 (14.28571%) points

At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

GOALS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33
(4.71428%) points

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

1 (14.28571%) points

One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Name:Concept map: GI

ORDER A SIMILAR PAPER AND DELEGATE FULFILMENT OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT TO EXPERT ACADEMIC WRITERS. PLAGIARISM-FREE, GUARANTEED A, TIMELY DELIVERY.

strategic planning visioning session

WHAT OUR CURRENT CUSTOMERS SAY

  • Google
  • Sitejabber
  • Trustpilot
Zahraa S
Zahraa S
Absolutely spot on. I have had the best experience with Elite Academic Research and all my work have scored highly. Thank you for your professionalism and using expert writers with vast and outstanding knowledge in their fields. I highly recommend any day and time.
Stuart L
Stuart L
Thanks for keeping me sane for getting everything out of the way, I’ve been stuck working more than full time and balancing the rest but I’m glad you’ve been ensuring my school work is taken care of. I'll recommend Elite Academic Research to anyone who seeks quality academic help, thank you so much!
Mindi D
Mindi D
Brilliant writers and awesome support team. You can tell by the depth of research and the quality of work delivered that the writers care deeply about delivering that perfect grade.
Samuel Y
Samuel Y
I really appreciate the work all your amazing writers do to ensure that my papers are always delivered on time and always of the highest quality. I was at a crossroads last semester and I almost dropped out of school because of the many issues that were bombarding but I am glad a friend referred me to you guys. You came up big for me and continue to do so. I just wish I knew about your services earlier.
Cindy L
Cindy L
You can't fault the paper quality and speed of delivery. I have been using these guys for the past 3 years and I not even once have they ever failed me. They deliver properly researched papers way ahead of time. Each time I think I have had the best their professional writers surprise me with even better quality work. Elite Academic Research is a true Gem among essay writing companies.
Got an A and plagiarism percent was less than 10%! Thanks!
prevnext

ORDER NOW


Consider Your Assignments Done

“All my friends and I are getting help from eliteacademicresearch. It’s every college student’s best kept secret!”

Jermaine Byrant
BSN

“I was apprehensive at first. But I must say it was a great experience and well worth the price. I got an A!”

Nicole Johnson
Finance & Economics

ORDER NOW

Our Top Experts

See Why Our Clients Hire Us Again And Again!


OVER

10.3k
Reviews

RATING
4.89/5
Average

YEARS
13
Mastery

Success Guarantee

When you order form the best, some of your greatest problems as a student are solved!

Reliable

Professional

Affordable

Quick

See our Results

ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT NOW

Using this writing service is legal and is not prohibited by any law, university or college policies. Services of Elite Academic Research are provided for research and study purposes only with the intent to help students improve their writing and academic experience. We do not condone or encourage cheating, academic dishonesty, or any form of plagiarism. Our original, plagiarism-free, zero-AI expert samples should only be used as references. It is your responsibility to cite any outside sources appropriately. This service will be useful for students looking for quick, reliable, and efficient online class-help on a variety of topics.