I. Peer Review: In your response to two of your colleagues, include whether you think the diagram effectively documents the case and whether the loops are self-evident and whether the diagram captures cause and effect.

Provide an example to support your position.

• Provides constructive, substantial, and meaningful input that is specific and directly related to the work-product of the colleague as it pertains to the assignment and weekly outcomes that will further assist your peer in developing his or her treatise
• Provides comments on organization, grammar, and proper APA formatting
• Remains professional in tone at all times

II. Discussion: Respond to two or more of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:

• Compare your analysis to your colleague’s and explain why you think there are similarities or differences.
• Provide an insight you gained by reviewing your colleague’s example.
• Ask a probing question supported by additional context from your experience and the readings from the week.
• Offer another issue that you think the organization identified by your colleague may face and suggest how you think the organization should improve with respect to its moral imagination or how you think the organization could bring about positive change.