Name

Professor

Course

Date

There is no hope for perfect research

Research can be described as the performance of an analysis of a particular subject that is pertinent in an area of study. The conduction of research is essential for the invention and innovation of facilities that increase the reliability of our day to day lives. Over the years, researchers have begun to increase in number due to the increase in the technical knowhow. For any economy to improve in the growth and development of an industry, their needs to be extensive research of a topic at hand. As the number of researchers continues to increase in number, the credibility of their research continues to diminish thus fabricating the once respected art (Ring, p. 45).

The purpose of this paper is to debate the argument that states that there is no hope for perfect research. The paper argues against the theory by providing two examples that discredit the argument. The paper finally provides a concluding sentence regarding the matter giving recommendations for the way forward.

Are their differences between males and females?

Over the years, research has been conduction to show the differences between males and females. This is a topic of interest in that, as human beings we are fascinated by the differences that both the male and female sex display. The research seeks to explain the behavioral aspects of both sexes which is determined by the brain. The research was conducted using different volunteers from all over the world. These individuals have different cultural aspects and levels of achievement making the expected results difficult to realize. Despite the challenges that limited the possibilities, the results recorded similar character traits of the men and women. The research thus displayed that there were differences between males and females. Some of the differences that were displayed were the way in which they both reacted to different emotions, subject’s world views and social skills (LeVay, p. 23).

Scientific evidence of survival

As human beings, we go through different phases that define our time on this earth. One of the phases is the passage from life to death. Death is the last stop for individuals in that there is no chance of resurrection. Reports on cheating death have on many occasions defied the odds thus forcing researchers to prove if there is indeed evidence of survival. After the conduction of several forms of research, Dr Ren king showcased credible evidence arguing of consciousness after death. This was conducted using several cases concerning different situations of near -death experiences. Some of the people displayed consciences by narrating the experiences they underwent. It is difficult to prove such situations in that most of the individuals are skeptical about conciseness after death. Despite this, enormous reports indicate that such situations are not as rare as people may be led to believe (Ring, p. 45).

In conclusion, research is performed to prove the credibility of a debated notion. There are different methods of research that reflect on the intensity of the topic in question. Some of the research that has been previously performed has recorded a high degree of fabrication. This has led to the call of the conduction of credible research. The argument that there is no hope for perfect research has thus been brought up. This however, has been disputed by the provision of evidence- based research that proved the theory otherwise.

Works cited

LeVay, S. A. Difference in hypothalamic structure between male and female men response to stimuli. Journal of human science. 253(5023):1034-7, 2001.

Ring, Ken. Scientific evidence for survival of consciousness of death Oxford, Oxford university press. 2000.