********Please if you do not how to fix it and not sure do not bid because you only have one chance to do it. If I did not get right I will withdraw you and get my money back. ****************you need to read everything here before you do it.You need to watch the videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=pubTiDCEVZ8Summary:  In a paragraph, share the argument. Include the following:Don’t forget to give credit where it is due.  At the beginning of the summary you’ll need to give the title of the video.What is the important issue the makers of the video want to address?What is the conclusion of the video, and based on what you saw?What are at least three reasons the video gives to support the argument? Remember, these all have to be inferred!  Analysis:  In a 2-4 paragraphs, analyze the following:Explain what you believe may have been the video makers’ value (how the world should be) and reality assumptions (how the world really is) that drove them to make the video the way they did.  Do you think these values are shared by many?  Why or why not?  Be specific.Share at least two logical fallacies you found in the video.  Give the fallacy and explain the part of the video that showed that particular fallacy.  Do you think using this fallacy was effective?  Why or why not?  Do the fallacies help or hurt the argument?  Why or why not?Who do you think was the original target audience for this video?  Keeping the target audience in mind, do you think the video will be effective for them? Why or why not?  Give two reasons to support your point.Compare the article you read on texting and driving for the library database activity to this video.  Which argument was more effective?  Give two specific comparisons from the article and/or video to support your point. Response:In a paragraph, share your thoughts on the video:  Do you think it’s compelling?  Should this be shown in the states?  Why or why not?Has this video changed your mind about what you do on the road?  Do you think it might change someone you know in the video makers’ target audience? Why or why not?  What do you think of texting and driving – should it be illegal?  Why or why not?  Give reasons and/or examples from the news to support your point. ********** folder number 1 I go 50 of %100”””””””””’************ folder number 2 i got %70 of hundred ******************************************** folder number 3 i got %85 of hundred *******************************************please look to both folder 1 , 2 ,3 and in the end fix folder 3******************You may need and use this to fix it. Post hoc ergo propter hoc           Attacking the person         Ad hominem           False cause         Ad populum           Everyone is doing it, so you should too         Begging the question           Answering a question with a question         Red herring           Changing the issue under discussion         Faulty analogy           Comparing apples to oranges         Appeal to tradition           Saying that something which has occurred in the past should therefore continue         False Cause           Saying that A causes B because A happens before B         Ad Hominem           Saying that a speaker should not be believed because of a personal flaw he or she has         Slippery slope           The domino effect         3 hours agoATTACHMENTS