In this activity, you will submit the third of four position papers required in the course. This paper presents your position on a specific issue related to technology and communication.

The purpose of the position papers is to encourage you to think and argue critically about specific issues related to science and technology in society, and to develop your own factually grounded opinions based upon the readings, external research, and your own personal frames of reference. Submission Instructions

Before submitting your paper, review the Position Paper Guidelines and the Position Paper Rubric to make sure you have addressed the criteria by which this paper will be assessed. Review the Research Resources to ensure that your paper utilizes credible and scholarly sources, and that you have cited your sources properly, following all of the guidelines for scholarly research. Rubric

HUMN 400 M7 Position Paper RubricHUMN 400 M7 Position Paper RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionThe introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument Point 1Section provides evidence of outside research and the appropriate use of citations and references. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. Educated and informed opinion. Support/proof used more than one source (preferably three).10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument Point 2Section provides evidence of outside research and the appropriate use of citations and references. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. Educated and informed opinion. Support/proof used more than one source (preferably three).10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument Point 3Section provides evidence of outside research and the appropriate use of citations and references. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. Educated and informed opinion. Support/proof used more than one source (preferably three).10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCounter Argument: Supporting Information for CounterclaimsSection provides evidence of outside research and the appropriate use of citations and references. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCounter Argument: Refutation of CounterclaimsSection provides evidence of outside research and the appropriate use of citations and references. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCounter Argument: Evidence for ArgumentsSection provides evidence of outside research and the appropriate use of citations and references. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionsThe conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics, Readability, and Style: ToneThe tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. Writing is scholarly and professional.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics, Readability, and Style: AnalysisPaper represents a comprehensive analysis that ties together the topic and how it relates to the overall theme of technology in society.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics, Readability, and Style: Grammar, Punctuation, and APARules of grammar, usage, punctuation, and spelling are followed. APA style is followed.5.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0PreviousNext