Words Citied:

https://www.afb.org/about-afb/history/helen-keller/books-essays-speeches/senses/three-days-see-published-atlantic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdzNaqISu0I

Format for your evaluation paper

Basic guidelines

Your paper must be in MLA format

It should be at least 4 pages + a Works Citied page

The writing should be in Startdard American English, well-structured, easy to follow, free from personal references and unnecessary wordiness.

Your introduction should

. Present the subject of your evaluation: ” The person, place, thing, event, or phenomenon that you are evaluating” (Ramage et al.371).

. Show why evaluating X is problematic or controversial

. Present your evaluation claim and your criteria

Your audience

Classic movie enthuslasts

Your purpose

Persuade your audience to see the value (or lack of value) of X

Each body paragraph should

. State a criterion and defend it if necessary

. Show that X meets or does not meet the criterion

Treatment of alternative or opposing views

. Summarize objections to your criteria or your match

. Respond to these objections.

Each reference to a source should

. Introduction the source using an attributive tag ( Ramage et al.555)

Quote or summarize the important information from that source

Explain the significance of the information from the source

Include a correct MLA in text citation which is also referenced in the final Works Citied page

Your concusion should

.Sum up your evaluation

A final note

This paper is not about you. It is about the issue. Therefore, the following words and phrases do not belong in your essay: I me, myself, we us, in my opinion, I think, I believe. Your paper is also not about your reader, and you do not know your reader, and you do not know your reader personality; there fore, the following words do not belong in your essay either: you, your, you’re, yoursel