Watch the media presentation describing a Game Theory Scenario: the Prisoners’ Dilemma.
Read the Case Studies found under Assignment Files below.
Pick one of the case studies to analyze. Set-up the analysis by using a similar matrix to what has been shown in the presentation (and script).
Discuss the possible decisions that could be made and the outcomes that could occur with each decision.
This application assignment should be uploaded as a Word document of at least 350 words. Correct APA style should be used. At least one citation should be added.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30.0 pts Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
27.0 pts Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
24.0 pts Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
21.0 pts Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
18.0 pts Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 pts Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis PRICE-P
40.0 pts Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
36.0 pts Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
32.0 pts Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
28.0 pts Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
24.0 pts Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0.0 pts Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
9.0 pts Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
8.0 pts Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
7.0 pts Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
6.0 pts Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA PRICE-I
10.0 pts Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
9.0 pts Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
8.0 pts Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
7.0 pts Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
6.0 pts Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 pts Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
Absolutely spot on. I have had the best experience with Elite Academic Research and all my work have scored highly. Thank you for your professionalism and using expert writers with vast and outstanding knowledge in their fields. I highly recommend any day and time.
Stuart L
Thanks for keeping me sane for getting everything out of the way, I’ve been stuck working more than full time and balancing the rest but I’m glad you’ve been ensuring my school work is taken care of. I'll recommend Elite Academic Research to anyone who seeks quality academic help, thank you so much!
Mindi D
Brilliant writers and awesome support team. You can tell by the depth of research and the quality of work delivered that the writers care deeply about delivering that perfect grade.
Samuel Y
I really appreciate the work all your amazing writers do to ensure that my papers are always delivered on time and always of the highest quality. I was at a crossroads last semester and I almost dropped out of school because of the many issues that were bombarding but I am glad a friend referred me to you guys. You came up big for me and continue to do so. I just wish I knew about your services earlier.
Cindy L
You can't fault the paper quality and speed of delivery. I have been using these guys for the past 3 years and I not even once have they ever failed me. They deliver properly researched papers way ahead of time. Each time I think I have had the best their professional writers surprise me with even better quality work. Elite Academic Research is a true Gem among essay writing companies.
Got an A and plagiarism percent was less than 10%! Thanks!
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
