The study was carried with five qualitative reach approaches evaluating the effects of instructional enhancements on the learning outcomes of students (Ann et al., 2011). It also seeks to investigate the effect of instructional enhancement for teachers on the learning outcomes for students. A multi -level investigation was carried on the data which enabled the researcher to work with the non-aggregated figures, and to give explanation of personal differences between students.

The finding main established passive outcomes on effect of instructional improvement on the learning outcome soft students. It was also revealed that the learning environments in institutions of higher learning established on the student centered teaching approach have the prospective to improve and enhance the learning outcomes of students.

This study would benefit both the teachers and the students (Ann et al., 2011). Teachers would be equipped with necessary slicks and instructional knowledge that they would in turn use to train the students.

The sample size is too big though participants are given the opportunity to practice competence-based and student-centered training (Ann et al., 2011). The participants were also encouraged to use their knowledge and skills in every module through the use of motivating teaching modes during contact periods, together with group, and individual assignments complemented by peer, and tutor feedback.

At the opening of the platform the novice teachers were requested to choose a single course out of the possible different courses they train students on to which entire assignments was then related. Attending the contact periods and doing the assignments took 140 hours of the study which was spread over within a period of one full academic year (Ann et al., 2011). There were two groups in this study including the control and experimental groups.