Provide a 24 pages analysis while answering the following question: Organizational Mindfulness in the Software Development Process. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. There are two types of mindfulness: organizational and individual. This classification is done to provide a clear distinction between the abilities of an organization or an individual. Individual mindfulness entails an individual’s ability to regularly come up with new categories in the interpretation and perception of the universe. Organizational mindfulness, therefore, refers to the cognitive aspects which are used to solve problems on an organizational level (Butler and Gray, 2006). Organizational mindfulness involves the continuous refinement and scrutiny of existing expectations depending on the ever-changing environment. Such refinement and scrutiny ensure that uncertainties are handled accordingly (Weick and Sutcliffe, 2001). The following are the components that make up organizational mindfulness.

Reluctance to Simplify Interpretations – this refers to the ability of an organization to recognize complex processes and situations and find ways to view the problem from different angles (Nagle, McAvoy, & Sammon, 2011). An organization that employs this component is able to identify different ways of handling complex issues and situations that occur during the software development process. This is because all views and opinions of the participants of the software development team are highly valued (Nagle, McAvoy, & Sammon, 2011). For an organization to employ this component during the development, one of the following factors has to be included in the development process.

1. Analysis of customer requirements or any requirements should be prolonged. This goes a long way to ensure that all participants or stakeholders of a development process are fully aware of the current state of affairs. Discussions that are held during the course of the development process should be conducted in such a manner that all those who do not fully grasp the situation are able to do so by the end of the discussion.