The task is difficult where it involves people of different cultures. Counseling and psychotherapy have become significantly influenced by the social and political contexts. The understanding of this past has led to the development of a number of critiques of multicultural therapy that gets supported by the views from, postcolonial, post-structuralism, and the feminist theory. Dealing with this cultural diversity has at times brought up a conflict that a single method I problematic since its origin becomes found at a point among the European cultures. The tainting of the race issue by the authors Jung and Freud should be viewed and understood in a broader historical context of the social, political, and medically representation when they attempted to comprehend and articulate theories of human beings’ development and therapy (Collin & Roy 2000, p.43).

The work that undermines this school of thought became based on the views that the meaning of sickness for a person, gets based on the network of meanings it has in a certain culture. A certain researcher, Doe, noted that the cultural views originating in a certain culture can be adapted and transformed into ideas, practices, and the languages of another culture in the therapy process (Collin & Roy 2000, p.44). This incorporation of the cultural constructs that permit the transferability of the cultural paradigms to the therapeutic process gives the therapists the necessary tool for effective intervention.

When counselors are culturally sensitive, the basis for finding the presenting problem gets complicated since there is no clear ground line for a potential hypothesis. The multicultural trans-theoretical integrationist opinion on what the client provides or shares could confuse and annoy the therapist striving for anxiety (Collin & Roy 2000, p.46).

At times, the process of therapy seems to have contained these conflicts through the counselor exerting.