Write a 6 pages paper on mock trial. When she broke up with her fiance just shortly before meeting my client, she suffered several depression and, by her own account, the breakup was very bad. Now, following her breakup with my client, she is seeking legal recourse – she is using the court as an instrument of revenge. The Crown has quite obviously allowed this perversion of the law and the court and is charging my client with entry into sexual relationships via the “exercise of authority.” According to the Crown, consent was vitiated by the imbalance of authority in the relationship. Miss McAdams, on the other hand, has stated the opposite – there was never any undue exercise of authority, the was a balance of power in the relationship and she was never, at any point, overwhelmed by Dr. Matheson’s authority. So, who are we to believe A woman with a history of less than reasoned reactions to the breakup of relationships or a successful professional who does not have such a history The affair between Miss Soudoski and Dr. Matheson was consensual. it occurred outside my client’s office and lasted for four months. We should not be here today and my client should, most definitely, not be standing trial for the exercise of his civil rights. a right which he exercised within the confines of its legal limitations. Do not allow for this perversion of the law.

Chief Examination

Dr. Matheson

Q1: Dr Matheson, are you aware of the severity of the charges brought against you by the Crown

A1: Yes I am. If proven guilty, I could loose my license and, hence, my livelihood.

Q2: Did you or did you not engage in an affair with Miss Soudoski

A2: Yes I did. Our professional relationship had ended by that time, however. As soon as I realized that our interest in one another was more than professional, I proposed that Miss Soudoski seek treatment elsewhere

Q3: Did she

A3: No she didn’t but, from a professional point of view, she really did not need to.

Q4: Are you claiming that she was well, that you had cured her from her depression in a handful of sessions

A4: No I am not. I am just saying that her depression was an exaggerated reaction to her fiance’s having broken up their engagement and cancelling their wedding. It would take time to pass but she did not need a psychologist for that. As I told her in our first meeting, this was something she had to work out for herself – work out by accepting the reality.

Q5: What was her response

A5: She insisted that she need professional help to get through this period.

Q6: When did the relationship move from the professional to the personal

A6: Maybe within a month or six weeks. Miss Soudoski began to take a personal interest in me and began asking me personal questions. What type of women I liked Whether I was single or involved in a relationship Questions of that type. At first I tried to avoid answering but to tell you the truth, I found her quite attractive. Therefore, I suggested that we end our professional relationship.

Q7: Who initiated the affair

A7: Miss Soudoski did. She invited me to her home for drinks and matters escalated from there.

Q8: Did you, at any time, meet with her in your office after that

A8: Yes I did – several times in fact.