competency
Design a public health initiative implementation and evaluation plan.
Scenario
You are a member of your community’s Public Health Policy Board which reviews public health issues in the area. Your objective is to gather community public health data regarding asthma and create a proposal for a health initiative implementation and evaluation plan to be reviewed by the board.
Instructions
Research the public health issue asthma in your community (city, county, state, or region) and formulate a written plan to submit to the Public Health Committee Board to be reviewed. Be sure to include the following:
- A detailed description of the illness
- The impact of the illness on the community
- Who is affected by the illness
- A detailed plan for implementation of the new initiative
- A detailed plan for evaluation of the new initiative
You may use a Word document or a similar application of your choice. If needed, please use the resources below to guide you with how to use popular software such as Microsoft Word and guidelines on how to construct a proposal. For additional information on asthma, please refer to the article located in the resource section.
Resources
For more information regarding asthma, please read Supporting Self-management of Asthma Through Patient Education.
Grading Rubric
|
F |
F |
C |
B |
A |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Did not Submit |
No Pass |
Competence |
Proficiency |
Mastery |
|
Not Submitted |
Asthma is described in a cursory, incomplete, or inaccurate way. |
The description of asthma is accurate but is short and does not go into detail on the condition. |
The description of asthma is accurate and complete with some small gaps or lapses. |
The description of asthma is accurate, effective, and complete. |
|
Not Submitted |
The potential impact on the community is ineffectively communicated, including either a lack of information or inaccurate information for people possibly affected. |
The potential impact on the community is communicated without depth or detail. The information for those possibly affected is included but lacks detail and specificity. |
The potential impact on the community is clearly communicated but lacks specific examples. Information is included for those possibly affected, but with little additional detail. |
The potential impact on the community is clearly communicated with detail and specific examples. Detailed information is included for those possibly affected. |
|
Not Submitted |
The included plan is unworkable, impossible to understand, or otherwise ineffective. |
A workable plan for implementing the new initiative is included but is cursory, vague, or unclear. |
A coherent, workable plan for implementing the new initiative is included but lacks some detail. |
A detailed, coherent, workable plan for implementing the new initiative is included. |
|
Not Submitted |
The plan for evaluating the initiative is unworkable, unreasonable, or incoherent. |
The plan for evaluating the initiative is included, but is cursory, lacks depth, or shows clear evidence of strong bias. |
The plan for evaluating the initiative is complete and accurate but contains some bias in favor of the initiative. |
The plan for evaluating the initiative is complete, accurate, and without bias in favor of the initiative. |
|
Not Submitted |
Frequent use of improper language, slang, or non-professional language. |
Language is generally appropriate for professional context with several lapses into informality or slang. |
Language shows use of formal professional English throughout with only minor lapses of informality and slang. |
Language shows proper formal professional English with no lapses of informality or slang. |
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
