|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChangeIdentifies the proposed change, reasoning for proposed change with examples of current practice, and expected outcomes.
|
| 10.0 pts
Full Marks
Content is thorough and persuasive. Major points are specific, stated clearly and well supported.
|
5.0 pts
Content is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
|
3.0 pts
Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed but not well supported.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of the literatureAt least THREE nursing research articles included. Appropriate nursing theory identified and supported with references. The bibliography should include at least 4 professional, refereed journal articles.
|
| 25.0 pts
Full Marks
Analysis of literature was excellently done and included questions and ideas for further research.
|
13.0 pts
The analysis of the literature was done well.
|
7.0 pts
The analysis of the literature referenced was poorly done.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
No analysis of literature provided.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBudget processestimate of how much the change will cost (attachment included)
|
| 10.0 pts
Full Marks
Budget preparation was excellently done. Budget included all expenses required for change (vendor quotes for equipment as appropriate, staffing hours, staff education, travel expenses, supplies, etc.)
|
5.0 pts
Budget preparation was done well. Budget included most of expenses required for change (vendor quotes for equipment as appropriate, staffing hours, staff education, travel expenses, supplies, etc.)
|
3.0 pts
Budget preparation was done well. Budget was missing some of expenses required for change (vendor quotes for equipment as appropriate, staffing hours, staff education, travel expenses, supplies, etc.)
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Budget preparation was done well. Budget did not include many of expenses required for change (vendor quotes for equipment as appropriate, staffing hours, staff education, travel expenses, supplies, etc.)
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscuss how nursing leadership can effect this change• Includes Essentials of Baccalaureate Education • Includes Essential Values • Applies Differentiated nursing practice • Identifies and applies appropriate ANA nursing standards • Incorporates ANA Scope of Practice • Identifies appropriate ethical considerations
|
| 25.0 pts
Full Marks
Discussion of how nursing leadership can effect change is thorough and persuasive. Major points are specific, stated clearly and well supported.
|
13.0 pts
Discussion of how nursing leadership can effect change is comprehensive and persuasive. Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
|
7.0 pts
Discussion of how nursing leadership can effect change is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed but not well supported.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Discussion of how nursing leadership can effect change is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics• Correct spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure and paragraph construction. • Absence of run-on sentences, incomplete sentences with compound ideas. • APA (6th ed.) format for documentation used throughout the paper
|
| 10.0 pts
Full Marks
Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with the use of excellent mechanics and paragraph structure. Thoughts are expressed in a logical manner. None or minor APA formatting errors
|
5.0 pts
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and organized with the use of excellent mechanics and paragraph structure. Thoughts are expressed in a logical manner. Some APA formatting errors
|
3.0 pts
Writing is unclear, and thoughts are not well organized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. 2 -3 run-on sentences exist. Few APA formatting errors
|
2.0 pts
Writing is unclear, and thoughts are not well organized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. 2 -3 run-on sentences exist. Many APA formatting errors
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Writing does not reflect an organization pattern Writing does not follow APA format
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization• Logical content and flow of ideas with smooth transitions between ideas and paragraphs. • Writer’s intent and meaning clear and specifically stated (does not ramble or elude)
|
| 10.0 pts
Full Marks
Concepts of paragraphs are filled with details of support for topic sentences. Paragraphs flow into each other with connective concepts.
|
5.0 pts
Concepts of the paragraphs are clear and easy to follow
|
3.0 pts
Structure of the paragraph is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement. Concepts are disconnected.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Organization and structure detract from the concepts of the paper. Concepts are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePower Ponit Presentation• Oral presentation • Visual design • Grammar and spelling
|
| 10.0 pts
Well prepared, speaks clearly, makes eye contact with audience, delivers with ease, invites questions. Visually appealing, clean simple layout, text is easy to read, graphics enhance understanding of ideas
|
5.0 pts
Engages audience, fluid delivery, uses different approach other than simply reading screen, invites questions Visually attractive, text is easy to read, colors enhance readability, graphics and special effects do not distract from understanding ideas
|
3.0 pts
Clear and understandable, uses limited delivery techniques Text is sometimes hard to read, sometimes graphics or special effects distract from understanding
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
Not clear, not understandable. Text is very difficult to read, layout is cluttered and confusing
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
Jermaine Byrant
Nicole Johnson
OVER
RATING
YEARS
